The phrase "analyses of the sections" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the examination or evaluation of different parts or segments of a larger document or study.
Example: "The analyses of the sections revealed significant differences in the data trends across the various demographics."
Alternatives: "examinations of the sections" or "evaluations of the sections".
Proximity ligation assay (PLA) analyses of all the sections of six of the harvested tumors showed positive and negative areas with membranous (Fig. 7a, arrows) as well as cytoplasmic (Fig. 7a arrowheads) EGFRs detected.
Petrographic analyses of the thin sections of all granite samples from the study area (Figure 7) reveal sericitisation of plagioclase.
The histological analyses of the tumor sections revealed a significant antiproliferative, antiangiogenic activity of the treatment group.
Morphometrical analyses of the thymic sections did not did not reveal any quantitative differences in the size of the medullary regions or the numbers of Aire+ cells in the medulla between controls and Adam17/Foxn1 thymi (data not shown).
Careful image analyses of the cross-section of the indented area show that the ceramic top coat undergoes a complex damage evolution during indentation that is altered by thermal treatment.
They also include the results of SEM-EDX analyses of the cross-sections performed at the DSM Laboratories (Geleen, Netherlands) at the time.
SEM and EDX analyses of the cross-section area of the Ni Al coating confirm that all three thicknesses consist of Ni, Al and O elements with a non-uniform chemical distribution.
Elemental chemical analyses of the cross-sections were obtained using a HITACHI S-4800 SEM instrument equipped with a Link ISIS energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analyser at an accelerating voltage of 20 kV.
It is plausible that the quality of these predictions can be improved by reproducing the genome-wide analyses of the previous section for a smaller set of functionally related genes.
We present our results in Section 3, comparing all methods in how they perform for specific analyses of the New York Times (NYT) (Section 3.1), movie reviews (Section 3.2), Google Books (Section 3.3), and Twitter (Section 3.4).
