Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "analyses of review" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be a mix of terms that do not fit together logically. An example could be: "The analyses of review processes are essential for improving our methods."
Alternatives: "reviews of analyses" or "analysis of reviews."
Similar(60)
For the separate analyses of reviews and original articles, only PIE is presented that is not influenced by the different number of papers in these two categories.
Where possible, and if appropriate, meta-analyses of review outcomes were performed.
Data analyses of this review were performed by Review Manager 5.2 (Version: 5.2.6, Cochrane Collabration, UK).
Similar details of adjustments made for the analyses of other review outcomes are freely available upon request from the review team.
In this section, empirical analyses of user review ratings in Phoenix are demonstrated.
The results and analyses of our review were hindered by the retrospective reporting, and heterogeneity of the patient population, diagnostic tests, and classification systems applied.
Table 4 Statistical analysis and categorisation of outcome for early benefit assessment in Germany (G-BA/IQWIG) and single technology appraisal in England NICEE) – a comparison Methodological element Benefit assessment in Germany (G-BA/IQWIG) Single Technology Appraisal in England NICEE) Systematic reviews & meta-analyses Assessment of review quality; assessment of heterogeneity.
Both quantitative and qualitative analyses of book reviews suggest that the instances of GM increase when the proficiency level increases (from Level 3 to Level 5 in comparison to native German speakers' GM deployment).
Therefore, incorporating methodological and reporting quality of primary studies in analyses of systematic reviews may be difficult.
However, to the best of our knowledge, only two cost utility analyses of medication reviews in the setting of RCTs have been published.
From a total of 245 meta-analyses of primary review comparisons from 148 reviews, 85 of these analyses showed a significant result (p<0.05) in favour of the intervention while 160 analyses showed a non-significant result (p>0.05).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com