The phrase "analyses of quality" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the examination or evaluation of quality in various contexts, such as research, product evaluation, or performance assessment.
Example: "The studies included several analyses of quality to determine the effectiveness of the new materials used in construction."
Alternatives: "evaluations of quality" or "assessments of quality".
It may be used for improving architectural analyses of quality characteristics of the software system to be realised.
OBJECTIVE With the recent passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, there has been a dramatic shift toward critical analyses of quality and longitudinal assessment of subjective and objective outcomes after lumbar spine surgery.
Source data in the data set passed the quality control; the control content included format checks, missing data checks, threshold checks, major range checks, internal consistency checks, comprehensive analyses of quality control, and data quality mark.
Intra-assay accuracy and precision for iothalamic acid in urine were calculated from results obtained from 6 replicate analyses of quality controls each at 4 concentrations (1, 2, 20 and 120 μg/mL of iothalamic acid in human plasma, and 25, 40, 200 and 1200 concentrations for human urine).
Both univariate and multiple linear regression analyses of quality of life data were performed.
Reporting of economic data in quality improvement studies is uncommon, and there are few formal cost-effectiveness analyses of quality improvement programmes.
In analyses of quality-score components, the summary ORs in studies with below-median scores for external validity and confounding control were similar to those for studies with higher scores (Table 4).
In contrast to Steinman [ 9], who made a quantitative analyses of quality-improvement strategies, our review, like those of Boonacker [ 10], Kaki [ 11] and Charani [ 12], was a qualitative analysis.> As in the case of any systematic review, ours suffers from the limitation of publication bias.
Heterogeneity was present when we pooled all the trials together but not for the separate analyses of high quality or low quality trials (fig 3).
We included all studies in analyses, irrespective of quality but noted methodological issues that might affect results, such as the lack of an adjusted effect estimate.
According to the analyses of clustering quality metrics, DBSCAN gives the better clustering quality than PAM and CLARA, CLARA gives the better clustering quality than the PAM.
