Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
The phrase "analyses is needed to" is not correct in written English.
It should be "analysis is needed to" if referring to a singular form, or "analyses are needed to" if referring to multiple analyses.
Example: "In order to understand the data better, analysis is needed to identify trends."
Alternatives: "evaluation is required to" or "examination is necessary to".
Exact(3)
Further research using improved methodologies (e.g., longitudinal designs, standardized measures, multivariate analyses) is needed to examine the broader social context in which HIV risk behavior occurs and identify underlying processes.
Detailed transcriptional profiling with high-throughput analyses is needed to unravel the sophisticated mutual correlation and potential for clinical utility in TB, HIV, and TB/HIV coinfection patients.
Therefore, we do not feel the collection of more data or further Bayesian analyses is needed to support our conclusions Another reviewer suggested that, given the small effect sizes, the authors should do additional analyses to validate their key results.
Similar(57)
Further data and analyses are needed to discriminate between the two scenarios.
Further phylogenetic analyses are needed to clarify the relationship of R. bresilius to other members of this clade.
Extension of follow-up and further data analyses are needed to confirm and clarify these findings.
Nevertheless, additional studies and analyses are needed to test its replicability in other environmental conditions.
Especially, when some parametric analyses are needed to modify fuel design, the equation can be applied very easily.
Further high-quality clinical trials, designed to facilitate future pooled analyses, are needed to provide definitive answers for policy-makers.
Multivariate frequency analyses are needed to study floods due to dependence existing among representative variables of the flood hydrograph.
Additional analyses are needed to further explore the complex dynamics that are at play, both between and within the WE and CEE region.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com