Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) of expression ratios (FL/LL) of 15 select genes subjected to both microarray and qRT-PCR analyses indicates a significant (P≤0.01) correlation between the two methods (r = 0.64).
Similar(59)
Contrary to these comparisons, ordination analyses indicated a significant shift in species composition in individual reserves.
All analyses indicated a significant main effect of exercise, p < 0.05.
Similar analyses indicated a significant negative association between superior frontal lobe MD and the Compulsive Sexual Behavior Inventory.
Our regression analyses indicate a significant dependency and correlation between the observed values and the predicted response values (R2 = 97.87% and R2[adj] = 95.75%).
Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and PCA-ANOSIM analyses indicated a significant change occurred in the bacterial community as a consequence of TCS treatments.
Logistic regression analyses indicate a significant influence of velocity and depth on limiting passage success and accurately predict greater than 87% of observed fish movements.
Intent-to-treat analyses indicated a significant Group × Time interaction on depressive symptoms, with this effect remaining when only completer data were included.
Post-hoc analyses indicated a significant difference (p < 0.05) in the number of student responses for each of the distractors than would be expected given homogeneous distributions for each of the items.
Statistical analyses indicated a significant linear trend between the prulifloxacin 300, 450, and 600 mg doses, which would point to an interesting relationship between dose employed and response obtained.
Shannon diversity of combined data did not significantly differ between habitats or restoration treatments for data sets 2 and 3, while multivariate analyses indicated a significant change of overall community composition after restoration in river (R) and oxbow (O) habitats of data set 1 and 3 of 6 study rivers from data set 2 (Table 1).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com