The phrase "analyses in the range" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the scope or extent of various analyses within a specific context or dataset.
Example: "The studies conducted provided analyses in the range of environmental impacts over the last decade."
Alternatives: "analyses within the scope" or "analyses across the spectrum".
Nineteen protein spots (7 and 12 from the analyses in the range of pH 3 10 and pH 4 7, respectively), displayed a statistically significant change in abundance.
In previous studies from our laboratory, we reported that the culture supernatant of S. malaysiensis AMT-3, S. drozdowiczii M-7A, and S. viridobrunneus SCPE-09 presented endoglucanase activity with optimal pH in the range of 4.0 to 5.0, optimal temperature around 50°C and molecular masses, according to zymogram analyses, in the range of 37 to 178 kDa [ 8– 10].
The thermal degradation properties of chitosan and lactic and/or glycolic acid grafted chitosan have been studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric analyses (TG) in the range of 25 500°C.
The residual SD from the corresponding statistical analyses was in the range of 7.2 8.0 bpm.
About 200 and 150 reproducible spots were observed and quantified in the analyses performed in the range of pH 3 10 and 4 7, respectively.
The heterogeneity of both analyses was in the range of moderate, as I was between 30 and 60%%.
Interestingly, the number of analyses in the target range was lower in the TEG group, resulting in a higher number of heparin dosing adjustments.
Concentrations of BPA in the urine samples analysed were in the range 0.357 1.58 ng mL−1.
Predicted risks for each individual were obtained from logistic regression analyses, were calculated in the range 0 to 1 and were rounded to two decimal points.
The latter correlation is particularly important, as it suggests that the modest correlation between PLAB Part 2 and both PACES (r=0.186) and the CSA (r=0.321) is not a reflection of poor correlation between clinical assessments in general but is more likely explained by the relatively low reliability of PLAB Part 2, which unpublished analyses suggest is in the range 0.55 to 0.71.
This was confirmed by time-frequency analyses in the 2 48 Hz range showing a higher power of the EEG signal recorded in the hippocampus as compared to the cortex (Figure 5C).
