The phrase "analyses in a small" is not correct and seems incomplete in written English.
It could be used in a context discussing the scope or scale of analyses, but it requires additional information to be clear.
Example: "The researchers conducted analyses in a small sample size to determine preliminary results."
Alternatives: "analyses in a limited" or "analyses in a minor".
Intraspecific variation of NUMTs has been reported from genomic sequence analyses in a small number of species.
A p value < 0.05 (2-sided) was considered significant for the primary outcome; p < 0.01 was considered significant for secondary outcomes to account for multiple analyses in a small sample.
Flow cytometric analyses in a small number of EBM samples (n = 6) was conducted to assess the presence of intracellular ESR1, and the median percentage of positive cells was 90.5% (IQR, 84.4%-93.3%; Figure 4A).
In biological datasets, each object is described by a large number of variables (or dimensions) and it is crucial to perform their analyses in a smaller space, to extract useful information.
Light microscopic analyses in a small-scale screen with ∼50 flies/genotype suggested that knockdown of cisd2 modified the external eye morphology in two strains that overexpressed wild-type Drosophila palmitoyl-protein thioesterase 1 (Ppt1).
To clarify the relationship between menopausal status and MetS, and to minimize the high collinearity between age and menopause, we focused our analyses in a smaller sample of women who are in similar age range.
First, for the second aim of the study we conducted multiple correlation analyses in a relatively small sample of subjects.
Since the publication of those meta-analyses, investigators in a small randomized controlled trial have assessed the impact of acetaminophen-based antipyretic therapy strategies on the outcomes of critically ill patients [ 3].
Other algorithms, such as [45], are only practical in analyses involving a small number of sequences.
These conclusions must be interpreted cautiously as the analyses were performed in a small subset of patients and results were based on univariate analysis of five patients.
These analyses revealed changes in a small number of candidates within the 240 mg/dL treatments on Day-3 (Ki67, Fabp7, and Tuj1), while the larger impact was again observed on Day-7, with eight of the nine candidates demonstrating alterations in transcription (Fig. 6).
