The phrase "analyses grade" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be a combination of two terms that may not be used together appropriately without additional context.
Example: "The analyses grade for the project was lower than expected due to incomplete data."
Alternatives: "evaluation score" or "assessment grade."
Several climate variables, gender, and age were included in multivariate analyses (Grade 4).
# Odds ratio @ Confidence interval In univariate analyses grade 3 or 4 anaemia was significantly associated with the presence of B symptoms occurring in 10% of patients with B symptoms compared with 5% without (p = 0.011).
In subsequent analyses patient age, disease stage, performance status and the toxicity variables were dichotomized as shown in Table 4. * Fisher exact p In univariate analyses grade 3 or 4 leucopenia was significantly associated with the presence of B symptoms occurring in approximately 40% of patients without inflammatory symptoms compared with 58% of those with B symptoms (p < 0.001).
The average value and spread of k for bottom ash was determined as 0.49 ± 0.07 and used to calculate grade within 2.4% from the manually analysed grade.
Analysing grade II/III together improved the consistency compared with a separate analysis of each grade subgroup (Kappa 0.69 vs 0.59, respectively).
Tumor specimens were fixed in 4% phosphate-buffered formaldehyde and processed into paraffin embedded tissue microarrays as previously described [ 15]. 275 samples were included in the analyses: 39 grade II, 41 grade III, and 195 grade IV.
We analysed grading accuracy and variability by measuring the absolute differences in stenosis grades instead of using stenosis categories.
Analysing grades separately, the concordance rates were 78% in grade I, 68% in grade II and 95% in grade III tumours (Table 1).
It should be noted that we were conservative in our statistical analyses of grade as a binary grouping (grades I II vs grades II I IV.
We also entered prior-year adjustment for each outcome, such that in analyses of Grade 2 outcomes, we controlled for Grade 1 adjustment, and in analyses of Grade 3 outcomes, we controlled for Grade 2 adjustment.
Table 2 Floatation data for T1 (second run) and analyses T1 2 Grade, % Mass distribution (g) (mass × grade) Fraction Time, min Mass, g Mass, % Cum.
