Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Western blotting analyses demonstrated no differences in TIMP-1 (29 kDa) protein levels between early and mid stages, while its levels decreased (p < 0.05) from the mid to late stage CL.
Analyses demonstrated no differences in either ICU or hospital mortality or LOS between the three groups of specialists.
Similar(58)
Comparison according to progestin type demonstrated no difference.
The analyses demonstrated no significant differences between microbiomes on implants and teeth in supra- or submucosal and supra- or subgingival biofilms.
> -wrap-foot> Adapted with permission from Masuda et al. [ 24] CI confidence interval, ERIRC expert radiologic images review committee, FAS full analysis set, NR not reached, OS overall survival, PPS per protocol set, TTF time to treatment failure, TTP time to progression aMedian Additional secondary efficacy analyses demonstrated no significant differences between treatment groups.
Pooled analyses demonstrated no significant difference in both early (OR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.69-1.16; P = 0.41) and late mortality (HR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.72-1.13; P = 0.38) between MV repair and replacement.
This randomized trial included 712 patients, and the overall and subgroup analyses demonstrated no significant difference in median survival for hyperfractionated radiotherapy compared with conventional radiotherapy.
Our analyses demonstrated no measurable difference of phosphorylated Foxo3a at S253, but we found a significant increase of phosphorylated Foxo3a at S315 and T32 in starved mice overexpressing SGK1 (Fig 6C).
Subgroup analyses demonstrated no treatment group differences among pre-/early adolescents but a significant difference in A1C among middle adolescents (9.61% control vs. 8.46% intervention; F = 7.20, P = 0.011).
VCP expression by Q-RT-PCR analyses demonstrated no statistically significant differences between wild type (AVG ΔCt = 5.65) and R115H knock-in (AVG ΔCt = 5.46) mice with a 95% CI (p = 0.97).
Our analyses demonstrated no statistically significant differences among the SGAs in either group based on this subdivision.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com