The phrase "analyses based on morphological" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing studies or evaluations that rely on morphological characteristics or structures, often in fields like linguistics or biology.
Example: "The research included analyses based on morphological features of the species to determine their evolutionary relationships."
Alternatives: "studies grounded in morphological" or "evaluations derived from morphological".
Despite considerable disagreement among morphology-based hypotheses, this basic division is supported by nearly all phylogenetic analyses based on morphological data [ 13- 15, 19, 22, 95, 191].
Although analyses based on morphological and combined data supported this relationship, sequences of the Rbp3 gene alone instead placed Oryzomys among a group that included Nectomys, Sigmodontomys, and a few other genera.
Phylogenetic analyses based on morphological characters have not yielded consistent results either, e.g. [ 9, 10].
The systematic validity of these groups is in full agreement with most recent phylogenetic analyses based on morphological and molecular data [ 26, 28, 34].
Our results confirm that the mitochondrial genome, unlike analyses based on morphological data or nuclear genes, consistently supports the non monophyly of Hexapoda.
However, as indicated in the previous paragraph, the results of cladistic analyses based on morphological data and a larger sample of sabethine taxa casts doubt on these relationships.
The monophyly of Ditrysia is recovered in the maximum likelihood analyses based on DNA, morphological and combined data sets (Figs. 2, 3 and 4, Additional files 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13).
Second, our analyses based on both morphological and molecular data indicate the phylogenetic distinctiveness of the Long-billed and the Slender-billed Vultures, supporting their taxonomic treatment as distinct species (e.g., G. indicus and G. tenuirostris, respectively) as recommended previously [ 29- 31].
Initial analyses based on molecular and morphological data suggested Psychodida and closely related families (Psychodomorpha) as the sister group of Brachycera, and this has been the predominant view (see [ 48], and references therein).
The analyses based on combined molecular and morphological evidence only include the sequences with numeral '1'.
Nevertheless, the inclusion of Pycnogonida within Arachnida is compatible with some previous analyses based on combinations of 253 morphological characteristics and molecular data (complete 18S rDNA and the D3 region of 28S rDNA) [ 14], and the mitochondrial protein-coding genes [ 15, 44], which indicated that Pycnogonida appears within Arachnida.
