Your English writing platform
Free sign upExact(1)
gambiae irrespective of the functional group analysed, with an average of 79.35% similarity between the two anopheline species (Table 5).
Similar(59)
A total of 731 F2 quail chicks (360 males and 371 females) were used for QTL detection analyses, with an average of 32 chicks produced by F1 females and 120 by F1 males in 6 successive batches.
Finally, the positive correlation between GO and interactome measured by the Φ coefficient was also highly significant and a bit higher than in the DIP-based analyses, with an average of +0.58 ± 0.06 (range: +0.37 – +0.37).
Similarly, a previous statistical cognition experiment showed misinterpretation of forest plots (i.e., graphs representing the results of meta-analyses) with an average of 42 out of 63 questions answered correctly (67 %) among 279 researchers with experience in meta-analysis [ 18].
The results were analysed using an average of Ct of No antibody and IgG as background.
The immunohistochemical study was performed by analysing an average of 25 submucosal ganglia in each preparation.
Mismatch analyses were unimodal, with an average of 3.5 pairwise differences for jungle cat and bimodal (with peaks at 1 and 6 pairwise difference) for the leopard cat (Figure 6A and B; Table 6).
Analysis of the M. loti MAFF303099 transcriptome allowed the identification of 2186 protein-coding genes that were differentially expressed after heat shock (out of 7231 genes analysed), with an average false discovery rate of 1.5% (accession number GSE43529).
In comparison, the RFLP loci analysed gave 59 alleles with an average of 7.4 alleles per locus.
Nucleotide variations for VvTFL1A in the grapevine core collection analysed is relatively high with an average of one polymorphic site every 50 nucleotides.
A total of 11 835 male and 12 561 female person-years over all the survey waves were analysed, with the average age of men increasing from 46.93 to 51.30 and that of women from 46.86 to 51.07.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com