The phrase "analysed objects" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing items or subjects that have been examined or studied in detail.
Example: "The research focused on the analysed objects to draw meaningful conclusions about their properties."
Alternatives: "examined items" or "studied subjects".
Figure 13 presents the relation of recognition rate versus occlusion for all the analysed objects.
With comparisons, it is, in general, critical whether the analysed objects are comparable at all.
Analysed objects have been dated back from the Eneolithic Period to the end of the Bronze Age including the early Iron Age and were excavated in Central Italy (mainly Abruzzo Region).
It is thus possible to conclude that the outer layer of the Baltic amber analysed objects was affected by environmental exposure, showing a porous, rough and opaque surface as a consequence of a change in the macromolecular structure.
The resulting dimensions are designed to detect the characteristics of the analysed object.
The optimal means of failure/damage risk assessment can be estimated on the basis of the current technical condition of the analysed object.
First, the dimension of the analysed object cannot be larger than a human body and also the material has not to be too dense; moreover, due to the limitation on dose which can be delivered in a medical CT, the signal is typically quite low and for this reason the resolution limited.
The result of a CT is a 3D reconstruction of the analysed object in which each point is represented through a grey level, proportional to the X-rays absorption, i.e. related to the density and atomic number of the crossed material.
Regarding to composition of previously analysed bronze objects from the Iron Age of Iran (especially Luristan), the binary Cu Sn alloy has been the commonplace event in copper alloys production and no deliberately ternary Cu Sn As or Cu Sn Pb alloys have been used to make metal objects [8, 10 12].
Finally, the electronic documents are further analysed as potential boundary objects which aim to create common understanding between sites and professionals.
Among the analysed units, 60% (18 objects) featured socially expected (and confirmed by experts) levels of landscape quality, and 20% (6 objects) required overall quality improvement in terms of both public and expert opinion.
