Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The absorbance was read at 595 nm using a FLUOstar OPTIMA plate reader (BMG Labtech Ltd., Bucks, United Kingdom) and the results analysed and calculated using the associated FLUOstar OPTIMA Software V1.32 R2.
Similar(59)
Data were analysed and binding parameters calculated using the supplied software.
The SJR represents awarded prestige per article in the analysed year and is calculated using a complicated iterative formula.
The natural fluctuation of BMLs over 6 – 12 weeks was analysed and sensitivity to change calculated using Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement as MDC values.
The linear combination of the three dC t values (BIRC5, UBE2C and DHCR7) was calculated using the same coefficients as in the EP risk score for all analysed samples:.
Derived traits, i.e. N-glycosylation patterns such as levels of galactosylation and sialylation were calculated using formulas shown in Supplementary Table 3. N-glycome differences between responder and non-responder patients were analysed with two-tailed t test followed by false discovery rate (FDR) correction.
These results were then meta-analysed using the weighted z values calculated using the inverse variance-weighted z-score as described by Bakker et al.[ 39] since the units used in the published GWAS differed from our own.
Time to first clinical response (days) was calculated using Kaplan Meier estimates and analysed using a Peto Peto Prentice Wilcoxon (PPPW) test [ 25, 26], stratified by country and evaluated at a significance level of 0.05 (two-sided).
Finally, the Ct values were calculated using the ΔΔCt method and analysed as previously described [ 9].
Response time was analysed for response under 15, 30, 40 and 60 min. Mean status time: This is calculated using the time in minutes for each of the individual observations and then calculating the mean.
For each social worker, mean clinical competency scores were calculated using the CTS scores from the two raters and analysed using descriptive statistics and t-tests to compare the baseline and follow-up scores between the intervention and control groups.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com