Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "analog items" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to physical objects or products that are not digital, often in contrast to digital items.
Example: "In a world dominated by technology, many people still appreciate the charm of analog items like vinyl records and film cameras."
Alternatives: "non-digital products" or "physical goods".
Exact(2)
We used visual analog items (VAS) to measure the time course of rapidly changing general drug effects and visual changes.
Self-report measures of drug-induced visual changes were the visual analog items "when I close my eyes I see complex abstract patterns" (hereafter shortened to 'patterns'), "when I close my eyes I see objects or non-living things" ('things'), "when I close my eyes I see animals, people, or beings" ('beings'), and "when I close my eyes I see places or landscapes" ('scenes'scenes
Similar(58)
VAMS consists of 16 analog scale items printed in a single page.
Reliability estimates for visual analog scaling items range from 0.40 to 0.95 [ 11], and these estimates compare favorably with those for other scales [ 12, 13].
The most useful access key to analog-form items is subject.
Using visual analog scales, its 24 items probe three dimensions pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items), and functional difficulty (17 items)—that are judged to be important by such patients.
I like analog analogies.
Using visual analog scales, its 24 items probe 3 dimensions – pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items), and functional difficulty (17 items).
The Swedish well-being self-report visual analog scale of 39 items was used.[ 62] There were no differences between the children with epilepsy and the healthy controls.
Responses to the stress level using 100 m Visual Analog Scale in 9 items (the higher score, the more stressful) and satisfaction level using 100 m Visual Analog Scale in 2 items (the higher score, the higher the satisfaction) were used to explore the relationship with the respondents to the willingness to work by independent t-test.
Secondary efficacy endpoints included global success at 3, 9, and 12 months; clinical response using a 10-cm visual analog scale for six items (cough, dyspnea, sputum, hemoptysis, chest pain, and nocturnal awakening); assessment of quality of life using the St. George's Hospital respiratory questionnaire; serologic response; all-cause mortality at end of study; and rate of CPA relapse.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com