Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
GPs with an unsatisfactory score (<4) in insightful practice.
(A story that frames benefits only in relative [not absolute] risk reduction terms is likely to get an unsatisfactory score).
If you get an unsatisfactory score, just laugh and joke, "Oh, wow, I really am a klutz," or something like that.
Similar(57)
ReCoDe received a single unsatisfactory score for genetic testing [1.38 (1.50)].
None of the other 4 candidates had an unsatisfactory practical score (0).
Among covariates, occupational profile (p<0.001) and an unsatisfactory ergonomic score (adjusted OR 2.3 95% CI 1.6 to 3.2, p<0.001) were also significantly associated with moderate or poor self-reported health.
Quality of induction never reached the unsatisfactory score of 3 in any sedation protocols used.
Oral hygiene was assessed using the "plaque" component of the Simplified Oral Health Index (OHI-S), according to the diagnostic criteria of the World Health Organization [ 15] and was dichotomized as "satisfactory" (score: <1) or "unsatisfactory" (score: ≥ 1).
# Score 1 3 unsatisfactory; Score 4 7 satisfactory; 7 9 superior * Based on Fisher's exact test **Please note that each resident may have several projects at various stages of completion and in different categories.
ReCoDe received only one unsatisfactory score for information retention in the area of genetic testing which was shown to be one of the less frequent sources of important information.
Those items are scored by using a Likert scale 1 – 3. Score 1 will be given if the performance of the nurse-midwife is unsatisfactory, score 2 if the performance is reasonable but could still be improved upon, and score 3 if the performance of the nurse-midwife is excellent and complete according to the protocol.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com