The phrase "an unfair performance" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe a performance that is perceived as unjust or biased in some way, often in contexts like sports, arts, or evaluations.
Example: "The judges' decision to score the routine so low was seen as an unfair performance, leading to widespread criticism from the audience."
Alternatives: "an unjust performance" or "a biased performance".
He dominated for three years, before jealous rivals, suspecting that his pharmaceutical habits conferred an unfair performance advantage, called for the implementation of drug testing, which had previously been confined to the dogs.
The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) have since abolished this limit, although they are still monitoring research into caffeine to detect whether certain levels may represent an unfair performance enhancement.
The question remains, whether the system enables some athletes to misuse the therapeutic exemption to gain an unfair performance advantage?
' The clinic manager has lots of responsibilities but they are underpaid, we get the same salaries as professional nurses and nursing assistants…' (Respondent # 54, GP) Nursing managers also complained that poor salaries for increased responsibilities were made worse by an unfair performance management and reward system: ' The performance management development system must be reviewed.
For instance, back when folks were just starting to use words like Upload and Download, my band, The Rosenbergs, managed to get Universal to change their unfair performance contract with an email, and you got Apple to change their policies with a blog.
In fact, a study of Cambridge students found that 10percentt use pharmaceuticals to help with their work and it's been claimed that other universities are looking for ways to screen students before exams in an attempt to cut out drugs they deem as unfair performance enhancers.
When current MAC protocols are applied, Transit Access Points (TAPs) farther from the gateway may suffer from lower throughput, or even starvation, leading to extremely unfair performance between mobile users.
With this setting, the WFO behaves as the MaxSNR yielding unfair performances.
Stimulants are prohibited because they are considered to provide an unfair enhancement of performance.
The issue is not just that this mandate is regarded by the umpires as an unfair means of monitoring their performance on the field.
In proficiency tests (PTs), the possible existence of an unknown random effect (such as instability or inhomogeneity of the measured items, or vagueness in the definition of the measurand) that could affect the reported values is a matter of concern, and may influence the performance evaluations in an unfair manner.
