The phrase "an oral hearing" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in legal or formal contexts to refer to a session where parties present their arguments verbally before a judge or panel.
Example: "The court has scheduled an oral hearing to discuss the motions filed by both parties."
Alternatives: "a verbal hearing" or "a spoken hearing".
First, they requested an "oral hearing".
The judges reached their unanimous conclusions without the need for an oral hearing.
As is usual these days, the court saw no need for an oral hearing.
"We believe that an oral hearing would greatly assist our understanding of this complex and sensitive issue by allowing us to put precise and specific questions to you".
He added that Microsoft had requested an oral hearing with European competition officials, which has been scheduled for Dec. 20 or 21.
Getting the supreme court to examine his case is a huge achievement – fewer than one in 100 applications to the court result in an oral hearing.
After an initial oral hearing last week, the court ordered Americans for Safe Access, a advocacy group for medical marijuana use and research to file a brief in order to "clarify and amplify the assertions made [by] Michael Krawitz regarding his individual standing", and to "more fully explain precisely the nature of the injury that gives him standing".
Miguel Solis, Manuel Valverde and Alexander Rivas are slated to attend a "private oral hearing" in Puntarenas on April 29, after charges were filed by Agence France-Presse photographer Yuri Cortez and Rolando Aviles of Costa Rican newspaper Al Dia.
The council said on Tuesday it would hold a written and oral hearing for a nonbank firm, but it did not name the company.
Delivering the verdict, Neuberger said it was not reasonable for Grieve to issue the veto "simply because, on the same facts and admittedly reasonably, he takes a different view from that adopted by a court of record after a full public oral hearing".
Yesterday, in an unexpected move, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit scheduled a 30-minute oral hearing on 24 September to hear arguments on whether Chief Judge Royce Lamberth's injunction that blocked NIH funding for work with the cells should be lifted while the case is being litigated.
