The phrase "an interested discussion" is not correct in standard English.
Did you mean "an interesting discussion"? You can use "an interesting discussion" when referring to a conversation or dialogue that captures attention or provokes thought.
Example: "The panel led to an interesting discussion about the future of technology in education."
Alternatives: "a captivating discussion" or "a thought-provoking discussion."
"The RFL was able to disclose that following positive and detailed discussions, an interested consortium is considering bidding for the Bradford Bulls, and that the consortium now has all the information needed to make a decision on whether it will make a formal offer for the club," the spokesman said.
A skillfully navigated, personalized discussion between an interested mother and pediatrician, employing sensitivity to a mother's specific technical understanding and personal concerns on this topic, is likely the best option, although perhaps the most difficult one.
"Khomeini had never been particularly interested in discussion and dialogue," Moin writes.
It is also interested in discussion surrounding solution options, feature functionality, customer experience and technical feasibility.
Their peers from Čelinac were extremely interested in discussion.
The Republicans are simply not interested in a serious discussion and certainly not a vote on anything beyond Mr. Bush's increasingly narrow agenda.
"I've got one really important meeting in Abu Dhabi with a seriously interested party and discussions with others are continuing," he said.
The purpose of an effective scoring system is to highlight potential high-risk patients for busy hospital practitioners and to act as a focus for generating a multidisciplinary risk/benefit discussion between interested parties.
Readers interested in a detailed discussion of the evolution of complex features should consult Gregory (2008), and those seeking a comprehensive overview of the state of our current knowledge of eye evolution should consult Lamb et al. (2007, 2008), Buschbeck and Friedrich (2008), Cronin and Porter (2008), Oakley and Pankey (2008), Piatigorsky (2008), and Serb and Eernisse (2008).
Most of the subscribers to this line of thought are likely fans of T.I. and not interested in a factual discussion of the truth.
