Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
The phrase "an infinity sequence of" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct term would be "an infinite sequence of," which is used in mathematical contexts to describe a sequence that continues indefinitely.
Example: "In mathematics, we often study an infinite sequence of numbers to understand their properties and behaviors."
Alternatives: "an endless sequence of" or "a never-ending sequence of".
Exact(1)
Let be a sequence of generated by (1.12) with the sequences, and in, assume for each, be an infinity sequence of positive number such that for all and.
Similar(59)
Let {x n } be a sequence of C generated by (1.5) with the sequences {α n }, {β n } and {γ n } in [0,1], assume for each n, μ i ( n ) is a infinity sequence of positive number such that ∑ i = 1 ∞ μ i ( n ) = 1.
The solution clearly oscillates for (x<4), and then, as it runs away to infinity, it exhibits a sequence of inflection points that give it a distinct oscillatory character.
In fact, Cantor's method of proof of this theorem implies the existence of an "infinity of infinities".
"There's kind of an infinity of potential there".
But does such a strange sequence comprised of an infinity of members followed by one more make sense mathematically?
In all that darkness was an infinity of information, invisible under the cloak of night.
Nevertheless, this experience is an integral one, in the sense of integrating an infinity of durations.
Verbal languages provide us with alphabets (with which we can assemble an infinity of words that name an infinity of objects, actions, relationships and events) and with grammatical rules that govern the sequencing of the words so as to construct sentences and stories that narrate events or explain ideas.
Lest an infinity of sensible qualities be generated, however, by an infinity of aggregations (if not of atomic kinds), Epicurus developed, from just this concept of infinity, the law of universal equilibrium of all the forces, or "isonomy".
When you go down the rabbit hole of spam, it's an infinity of infinity".
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com