Sentence examples for an increase in streamflow from inspiring English sources

Land use changes resulted in an increase in streamflow, but the erosive response differed between catchments.

This partly explains the lack of increase in initial post-fire streamflow reported after wildfire compared to an increase in streamflow following forest harvesting experiments during wetter periods.

Results in large-scale catchments, suggest similar effects to those in small-scale catchments, with deforestation resulting in an increase in streamflow (Costa et al. [2003]; Siriwardena et al. [2006]).

For analysis of response to future conditions, the SWAT model with integrated plant growth response to increased CO2 predicts an increase in streamflows relative to models without the CO2 response, consistent with previous research.

A 20% precipitation increase in the Wujiang watershed results in a 22% increase in streamflow under normal temperature condition, but still 17% increase in streamflow under a temperature of +0.8°C and 27% increase in streamflow under a temperature of −0.5°C scenarios.

Even so, there was some evidence for a slight increase in streamflow for the first few years after clearing.

By contrast a significant increase in streamflow relative to the pre-treatment level has been recorded in the Jackwood catchment after 23 years (157.6 mm a−1).

Analyses of the frequency, intensity and duration of pluvials and droughts indicates a sustained increase in streamflow since the 1960s, which is exceptional since 1680.

Five of the treated catchments experienced a significant increase in streamflow following forest disturbance, equivalent to annual water yield changes ranging from 120 mm to 319.6 mm which varied in proportion to the percentage of each catchment logged.

The results projected an increase in the high streamflow by 44% for a majority of subbasins upstream of flood control reservoirs in the central United States (US) and a decrease in the low streamflow by 11% for subbasins upstream of hydropower reservoirs across the western US.

Excluding the non-stable values within +10% precipitation changes, a 1% precipitation increase generally results in a 1.15 1.69% (mean 1.42%) increase in streamflow and a 1% precipitation decrease generally results in 1.46 1.69% decrease in streamflow.