Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The positive value of ΔS° (0.03 kJ mol−1 K−1) corresponds to an increase in randomness at the solid solution interface with some structural changes in the adsorbate and adsorbent (Kyzas and Koltsakidou 2015).
Similar(59)
The positive values of ΔS indicate that there is an increase in the randomness in the solid/solution interface during the sorption process.
Metastatic breast cancer is characterised by an increase in the randomness of the local expression correlation patterns.
These results demonstrate that a metastatic cancer phenotype is characterised by an increase in the randomness of the local information flux patterns.
Based on the observation that frequent genomic alterations underlie a more aggressive cancer phenotype, we asked if such an effect could be detectable as an increase in the randomness of local gene expression patterns.
Indeed, as the hypothetical example in Figure 1 shows, the metastasis phenotype may be associated with a significant increase in randomness but not necessarily with a significant change in the average nearest-neighbor correlation.
Robin Caresearcheris, atresearcher at Imperial College who took part in the study, said the sudden increase in randomness in brain activity appeared to reflect a deeper and richer conscious state.
The positive values of ∆S° indicate that increase in randomness occurred at solid solution interface during the adsorption process.
The positive values of ΔS° suggested the increase in randomness at the solid/solution interface during the adsorption of atrazine in aqueous solution on the PA6/PPy NFM.
The positive value of the ∆S° (0.0311 kJ mol−1 K−1) indicated the increase in randomness of the adsorption process, which showed that the adsorption system is favourable.
The positive ΔSo value (0.0616 J/mol K) reveals the increase in randomness at the solid-solution interface during the fixation of the antimony ion on the active sites of the adsorbent.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com