The phrase "an important discrepancy in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a significant difference or inconsistency in data, findings, or opinions within a specific context.
Example: "The researchers noted an important discrepancy in the results of the two studies, which raised questions about the validity of the conclusions."
Alternatives: "a significant difference in" or "a notable inconsistency in".
Here we present apatite fission-track and (U Th)/He ages that suggest several important features of the long-term geomorphic history of this region, but which also illustrate an important discrepancy in the thermal histories derived from each technique.
There is also an important discrepancy in NW Europe during the same period.
At arrival, CKD-EPI and rG-CystC showed an almost perfect agreement, classified almost the same patients as having CKD, but at discharge their agreement was substantially lower and they showed an important discrepancy in CKD classification that reached statistical significance.
A very important discrepancy in our study compared with the study by Carstensen et al. was that we only documented an increase in incidence of patients with diabetes requiring GLM.
In particular, an important discrepancy is observed for the KOH activated materials, suggesting that this treatment may provoke changes of pore shape.
There, therefore, exists an important discrepancy between our definition of depression and anxiety in this patient cohort, and that based on a clinical diagnosis that utilises somatic symptomology.
Separate ratios of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitution rates for external (ω e ) and internal (ω i ) branches were estimated using HyPhy This important discrepancy in evolutionary rates between those AIV subtypes that circulate in wild birds compared to poultry can be explained in at least two ways.
There are important discrepancies in the results of detonation studies of starch particle suspensions in various gaseous atmospheres.
However, there are important discrepancies in the assignation of the origin of the visible contributions, being still a matter of high controversy [42].
