The phrase "an ideal value of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a specific value that is considered optimal or most suitable in a given context, such as mathematics, science, or economics.
Example: "In this experiment, we aim to determine an ideal value of temperature for optimal enzyme activity."
Alternatives: "a perfect value of" or "an optimal value of".
The overall supply sub-system SES index is approximately 0.75 (against an ideal value of 1.0) which reveal the shortfall from the desired value.
It has an ideal value of 1 (and hence the ideal value of the tolerance factor is also 1).
ERGAS and SAM will both produce positive values with an ideal value of 0. However, values that are around 3 are referred to a good image enhancement.
This means that, at an appropriate stringency during the posthybridization washing step, the normalized ratio of a homozygous wild-type should approach an ideal value of 1.0, which represents a much more intense signal from the wild-type probe than from the mutant probe.
We also searched an ideal value of threshold τ by repeated trials to detect large continual regions, and we set τ to 1.3 and 1.6 in the respective medaka and human data.
We also calculated the speed of injection for 1 cc of drug to be approximately 0.17 cc per second, which was an ideal value compared to that of similar foreign devices.
A log-transformation weights observations automatically to a ratio scale (Keene, 1995), thus ascribing equal weight to increases and decreases in meta- d'/d' relative to a theoretically ideal value of 1. Meta- d' is theoretically bounded below by zero, but when fit using an unbounded maximum likelihood estimation procedure estimation error may lead to negative values in practice.
This experimental threshold is a little greater than the ideal value of 0.15 for a complete random system, suggesting that these ion cluster phases containing functional groups are not randomly dispersed in a practical SPPO membrane.
This input difference produces a maximum deviation of A · VDD/2n+1 from the ideal value of VREF at the amplifier's output.
While 55% of samples had an A260/A280 ratio within the ideal value of 1.8-2.0, 1.8-2.0,approximately values less than 1.8, indicative of more protein contamination.
Although the RMSEA (0.076) was higher than the ideal value of 0.06, a strong SRMR finding (with the value of 0.040) suggested that the amount of free parameters challenged obtaining a favorable RMSEA.
