The phrase "an explication of how" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when you want to describe a detailed explanation or clarification of a process or method.
Example: "The report includes an explication of how the new software will improve efficiency in our operations."
Alternatives: "a clarification of how" or "an explanation of how".
He has prepared some sober remarks for the occasion — a paean to the mighty tweet, an explication of how new tools of social media are reinventing business, social activism and everything in between.
Some of these tensions can be put down simply to his changing his mind (see Cover and Hartz 1988 for an explication of how Leibniz's views on space developed).
The problem of empiricism became then the problem of coordination between the formal theoretical structures and the records of observations in such a way that it also offered an explication of how scientific knowledge can be formally constructed (especially logic and mathematics), empirically grounded (except logic and mathematics), rational and objective.
What follows is an enchanting explication of how the lady acquired, named and now cares for all those dogs, including "Bingo, who was always late".
It was a transparent explication of how the three-color process works, yet in this case, one could never see all the full-color images at the same time, as Bob had perversely scrambled the separations.
Lichtenstein painted Bedroom at Arles, not after The Artist's Room at Arles, but after a postcard of it, offering a tongue-in-cheek explication of how his painting "improved" Van Gogh's: "I've cleaned his room up a little bit for him; and he'll be very happy when he gets home from the hospital to see that I've straightened his shirts and bought some new furniture.
But the advertised explication of how the party "will deliver a bright future for the next generation" left her shrugging her shoulders.
Another contribution of the study concerns the explication of how participants at the different levels of proficiency deployed different forms of PVT in relation to L2 learning.
This 'promise of consistency' is taken over in literature by many, seemingly unquestioned and in most cases without further explication of how this works out (cf. e.g., [3, 31, 37, 38, 39]).
Another shortcoming of the NHRS framework is the lack of explication of how research is to contribute to better action for health.
While previous articles have examined academia-industry patenting with respect to publications and conferences [ 1, 6, 9- 11] there has been little explication of how these factors influence scientific collaboration and collaborative scientific meetings.
