Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
He had held that the (material) intellect does not know singulars through universal species, but thanks to the intentional representation of a given singular present in the elementary thought and accessible to the intellect only at the moment of the active union of a single individual man with the material and active intellects in the soul.
But Burley's explanation, however interesting, has a weak point, since it does not clarify how it is possible for the material intellect to know an individual existing outside our mind by means of a singular intentional representation that is not present in it, but in elementary thought.
On the other hand, the active intellect impresses on the material intellect the intelligible species, when the phantasm inhering in the elementary thought is presented to the material intellect itself.
In the first case, the material singular is the direct and sufficient object of the intellect, insofar as elementary thought, like common sense and imagination, is directed exclusively towards individuals, both substantial and accidental.
Although Burley seems to accept the existence of a separate material intellect, unique to the whole human species, he emphasizes the fact that without the contribution of elementary thought, which provides us with the phantasm, the material intellect cannot be united to the active intellect in knowing.
Since, in Burley's view, both the active intellect and the intellect in habitu are not strictly speaking faculties of the soul, but the primary cause of understanding and a state of the soul, respectively, it is necessary for him to offer two distinct accounts depending on whether it is the elementary thought or the material intellect which is in question.
Me and White friends would sometimes would watch things that would make us think that "blacks were the real racists" and other elementary thoughts like this, but there was no real understanding behind it.
Actually, the thought of an elementary school-aged child reading anything here is horrifying.
The New York Times asked students at an elementary school, an intermediate school and a high school for their thoughts.
For parents and schools staff, there is no way to avoid thoughts of the nightmare that unfolded Friday morning in an elementary school that could have been any elementary school, anywhere.
Today, however, after the most unspeakable horror ever committed in an elementary school, I couldn't care less about finding an interesting or thought-provoking angle.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com