Sentence examples for an average effect size from inspiring English sources

The remaining participants displayed an increase in peak velocity post-exercise with an average effect size of 0.19 ± 0.13.

The random-effects estimate of the mean can be interpreted as an average effect size because it does not assume the population of effect sizes can be completely explained by a unique effect-size representation.

New Zealander John Hattie publishes numerous reviews of reviews of research, and routinely finds effect sizes of +0.80 or more, and in fact suggests that educators ignore any teaching method with an average effect size of +0.40 or less.

Henry et al. [14] reported an average effect size for low (r = −.14 or d = −0.28) versus high (r = −.40 or d = −0.87) demand conditions, together with the required ks, Qs, and ps, and concluded that age declines are much smaller in low demand than in high demand prospective memory tasks.

A review of the literature [ 4] concluded that pre-university academic achievement predicted academic success in undergraduate training with an average effect size of d =.30 and postgraduate training with an average effect size of d =.14.

Based on 13 controlled studies, the authors found an average effect size of 1.11 in favor of group CBT.

41 Based on an average effect sizes close to one from two RO-DBT pilot trials for RD 32 33 and one pilot trial of DBT for TRD, 73 we judged it feasible and desirable to power REFRAMED to detect a standardised difference of 0.4 between-groups (RO-DBT and TAU likely to be considered clinically relevant by the UK National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE).

This produces an adjusted average effect size of 0.29 (95% confidence interval 0.23 to 0.35), which is close to the estimate produced by the meta-analysis of the FDA data (0.31, 0.27 to 0.35).

A meta-analysis of 89 effect sizes from a pooled sample of 7032 produced a weighted average effect size of r = .23.23

Forty-two effect sizes from a pooled sample of 13,168 respondents produced a weighted average effect size of r = .26, p < .001.001

As expected, a meta-analysis of these data produces a higher average effect size for the journal data (g score=0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.37 to 0.45) compared with the matched FDA data (0.37, 0.33 to 0.41).