The phrase "an attack of terrorism" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a specific incident or event where acts of terrorism are carried out against individuals or groups.
Example: "The city was shaken by an attack of terrorism that left many injured and caused widespread panic."
Alternatives: "a terrorist attack" or "an act of terrorism."
In "Our Diplomats Deserve Better," Prudence Bushnell, a former ambassador to Kenya and Guatemala (Op-Ed, Sept. 14), gives a realistic appraisal of the State Department's security posture at embassies before, during and after an attack of terrorism.
"There has been a consensus achieved among the White House and everyone here that for an attack of terrorism, the government will have to be the insurer of last resort," Mr. Schumer, a New York Democrat, said.
"It is the responsibility of those who carry out the attacks of terrorism and those who incite them".
Poroshenko appeals to the global community to treat the missile attack on MH17 as more than just a local problem, calling the attack an act of terrorism and a wake-up call for the whole world.
You took the lead in calling the World Trade Center attack an act of terrorism, which at the time was covered in most insurance policies.
A spokesman for the Saudi interior ministry, calling the attack an act of terrorism, said the bomber detonated a suicide belt hidden under his clothes inside the mosque, causing a number of people to be "martyred or wounded".
If it was about Christianity – and obviously it wasn't – but if it was, it begs the question why Fox News has refused to brand the attack an act of terrorism?
President Barack Obama, who plans to attend an interfaith service on Thursday in honour of the victims in Boston, labelled the attack an act of terrorism.
Authorities have deemed the attack an act of terrorism.
(Republicans then complained that the statement fell short of labeling the attack "an act of terrorism").
Minnesota Gov. Mark Dayton (D) called the attack "an act of terrorism".
