The phrase "an assertion for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a statement or claim made in support of a particular argument or position.
Example: "The researcher made an assertion for the necessity of further studies in the field."
Alternatives: "a claim for" or "a statement for".
An MoD spokesman said in a statement: "The implication that repeated requests from Afghanistan for further investment in Bastion force protection were turned down in the UK on financial grounds is an assertion for which we have found no evidence".
From a Geertzian perspective contradictions were regarded as exceptions – to an assertion for which there was overwhelming support (i.e., forming a pattern that had thick coherence).
The first solution described above addresses this problem; the user/CEUA can refuse to request an assertion for claims that can be easily guessed.
There must also be surface properties, which are the properties by which we can tell whether an utterance is an assertion, for instance that it is made by means of uttering a sentence in the indicative mood.
MacFarlane's framework is relativist, with the idea that the truth of a sentence, as well as the evaluation of an assertion, for some particular kinds of sentences (e.g., concerning future contingents) must be judged with respect to both the original context of use, and a separate independent context of assessment (e.g., by an assessor at a future time).
Missouri counterterrorism analysts suggested that support for Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, might indicate support for violent militias - an assertion for which state officials later apologized.
Elections today are rather an assertion of identity for India's many regions and castes, each of them scrambling for a piece of the national political pie.
The parties making an assertion of ownership, for instance, would grasp the thing in dispute and lay a wand on it, after which the magistrate would intervene and say, "Let go, both of you".
In times of domestic austerity, it is tempting to look abroad for an assertion of our continued relevance.
The mere fact that they can "foresee" that the article will be circulated and have an effect in California is not sufficient for an assertion of jurisdiction.
The court agreed that neither petitioner's contacts with California would be sufficient for an assertion of jurisdiction on a cause of action unrelated to those contacts.
