The phrase "an application for order" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal or formal contexts when referring to a request made to a court or authority for a specific order or directive.
Example: "The lawyer submitted an application for order to the court, seeking a temporary restraining order against the defendant."
Alternatives: "a request for order" or "a petition for order."
which sets forth the elements of an application for an order, required a national security official in the executive branch, typically the director of the F.B.I., to certify that "the purpose" of the surveillance is to obtain foreign intelligence information (amended by the Patriot Act to read "a significant purpose").
Media organisations had protested against the decision, and a lawyer representing the victim's male friend – who was also injured in the attack – submitted an application for the order to be overturned, arguing "the whole nation is interested in knowing the proceedings of the case".
Victims would not be required to testify when an application for an order was heard, it adds.
In Tan Eng Chye v. Director of Prisons (2004), a case concerning an application for an order of certiorari to quash the certification by a prison medical officer that the applicant was fit to undergo a caning punishment, the High Court held that not every act of or conduct by a public servant is justiciable by way of a judicial review.
Although an application for an intervention order can be made by police, many women wrongly believe this means that the police prosecutor also represents them.
Shortly after 10 a.m., a sergeant who had been at the scene of the accident arrived at the Bronx district attorney's office to work with prosecutors on an application for a court order.
Even if they can afford to take such action, by the time an artist, or copyright owner, identifies an infringement, issues an application for a takedown order and allows the legal process to take its course, these websites have clocked in several million more page views.
"The public importance naturally accorded to a university's statutory obligation to maintain freedom of speech and academic freedom would be accorded very significant weight by any court considering an application for a mandatory order under the [Counter-terrorism and Security] Act," he said.
Congress could, however, authorize the FISA judges to appoint, from time to time, independent lawyers with security clearances to serve "pro bono publico" — for the public's good — to challenge the government when an application for a FISA order raises new legal issues.
They had no choice, they argue in an "ex parte application for order of publication of summons".
