The phrase "an added objective" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing an additional goal or aim that has been included in a plan or project.
Example: "In our project proposal, we have included an added objective to enhance community engagement."
Alternatives: "a supplementary goal" or "an additional aim".
It shares the objective of minimizing overall cost as that presented in Hu et al. (2004), and it also has the added objective of maximizing system efficiency.
The second one would be to develop predictive models that could offer the clinician an estimation of the clinical scale score expected for a patient, thus adding objective data that could facilitate the and to follow the progression of a patient.
Our analysis adds objective probabilistic expression to the volcanological narrative at the time of the 1976 crisis, and demonstrates that a formal evidential case could have supported the authorities' concerns about public safety and decision to evacuate.
The comprehensiveness of the ESHRE/ESGE classification adds objective scientific validity to its use.
Our study adds objective measures of paternal insulin resistance, endothelial function, and lipid profile to these phenotypic characteristics.
One way this item may be modified is to add objective qualifiers such as presence of broken or damaged installations.
All surgeons and nurse practitioners (8 of 8) agreed that CARAT provides value in adding objective evidence to clinician recommendations.
9 One approach to improving assessment and outcomes in routine care is to add objective laboratory measures of activity and attention for diagnostic assessment and treatment optimisation.
On the organizational level, self-reported data on project implementation could become more valid by adding objective measures [ 9], such as on-site observations by a team of researchers (which require more resources than available in this study).
When we added an objective measure (the methacholine challenge test) these prevalence rates fell to about half (10.2% in RP and 7.3% in SL), suggesting that only using symptoms to diagnose asthma in epidemiological studies produces an overestimate of prevalence, due to the possible inclusion of false-positive results.
