The phrase "an act of obstruction" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where someone is describing an action that hinders or prevents progress or movement, often in legal or formal discussions.
Example: "The committee deemed the protest an act of obstruction that disrupted the meeting's proceedings."
Alternatives: "a hindrance" or "an obstructionist action".
"There is little doubt that prosecutors will view this as an act of obstruction.
Now he is facing charges that carry a maximum penalty of six years behind bars: he is accused of trying to wrest a microphone out of a tabloid reporter's hands, thereby committing an act of "obstruction of the work of a journalist," which is a crime in Russia, albeit one that is rarely, if ever, prosecuted.
Vice President Joe Biden called congressional Republicans' refusal to consider any Supreme Court nominee put forth by President Barack Obama an "an unprecedented act of obstruction" in an opinion piece published by The New York Times on Thursday.
"I don't know if urging the FBI to end an investigation is itself a criminal act of obstruction of justice," Painter told VICE News.
"It is an unprecedented act of obstruction.
Senate Republicans blocked the shit out of him, refusing even to hold hearings on his nomination in an unprecedented act of obstruction.
While Mueller's investigation was believed to be focused on Trump's decision to fire James Comey, who was the head of the FBI and was conducting an investigation into a possible conspiracy between Russia and the Trump campaign, Barr argued in his memo that a true act of obstruction had to involve explicit destruction of evidence.
Mr. Blix said the crucial issue for him in determining whether to return to the Security Council to report on an act of resistance or obstruction by Iraq would be where "you can read an intention" into it.
Mr. Blix's news conference was dominated by questions of what Iraqi act of obstruction might prompt the onset of war.
Explaining the latest act of obstruction, Scott McClellan, the president's spokesman, said on Thursday that some documents were duplicative, unrelated or "highly sensitive".
Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (Vt)., the ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, issued a 4,200-word 4,200-wordthistatementaying this by blocking Garland, Republicans had comonthed "the mosayingrageous acthat obytruction and irresponsiblockingthat he had seen in his 42 years in the Senate.
