Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

amounts of times

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "amounts of times" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct expression is "number of times." Example: "I have visited that museum a number of times over the years."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

7 human-written examples

"You know, of course I have lost to her numerous amounts of times," Sharapova said.

I get to have real conversations with people over very short amounts of times, sometimes even just seconds.

News & Media

Huffington Post

I gradually worked my way to running for greater amounts of times -- two minutes, one whole song -- until I could run a whole mile without stopping.

News & Media

Huffington Post

She has never picked up on it, despite the countless amounts of times I've attempted to impress my feelings upon her.

News & Media

Huffington Post

Control and CRS-exposed animals spent similar amounts of times in the open portions of the maze [ F7,7 = 3.854, Student's t-test P = 0.1749].

Occasionally, some of the activities mentioned here were also performed by other occupational categories, but at proportionally different amounts of times.

Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

46 human-written examples

Road repair also seems to take inordinate amounts of time.

News & Media

The New York Times

He also spent increasing amounts of time in London.

We spent huge amounts of time on this.

News & Media

The Guardian

I spent enormous amounts of time with them at Stanford.

News & Media

The Guardian

And she has endless amounts of time for political campaigning".

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "amounts of times" in formal writing. Instead, opt for the grammatically correct "number of times" or other alternatives to ensure clarity and professionalism.

Common error

A common mistake is using "amounts of times" as a direct substitute for "number of times". While seemingly similar, "amount" typically refers to uncountable nouns, whereas "number" is used for countable nouns. Using "number of times" is grammatically correct and more widely accepted.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

1.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "amounts of times" attempts to quantify the frequency of an event. However, this phrase is grammatically incorrect. As Ludwig AI points out, a more suitable and grammatically correct alternative would be "number of times".

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

43%

Science

29%

Wiki

14%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "amounts of times" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in formal writing. As Ludwig AI indicates, "number of times" is the preferred alternative, and it is crucial to consider the countability of the noun when choosing between "amount" and "number". While "amounts of times" may appear in informal contexts, it's best to opt for grammatically sound alternatives like "number of times" or "frequency of occurrences" to maintain clarity and professionalism in your writing.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say "amounts of times"?

The correct way to express the idea of "amounts of times" is to use "number of times". "Amount" is generally used for uncountable nouns, while "number" is for countable nouns.

Is "amounts of times" grammatically correct?

No, "amounts of times" is not grammatically correct in standard English. The correct phrasing is "number of times".

What alternatives can I use instead of "amounts of times"?

Alternatives to "amounts of times" include "number of times", "frequency of occurrences", or "instances of occurrence", depending on the context.

When should I use "number of times" instead of "amounts of times"?

Always use "number of times" in both formal and informal contexts. "Amounts of times" is not considered standard English and should be avoided.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

1.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: