amounts of fraud

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "amounts of fraud" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the quantity or extent of fraudulent activities or incidents. Example: "The investigation revealed significant amounts of fraud within the organization, leading to severe consequences."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

That means they're more costly than they need to be, more error prone, subject to increasing amounts of fraud, and provide a slower and more opaque process for borrowers than might otherwise be possible.

TechCrunch

While the big scandals receive all of the publicity, the statistics show that smaller amounts of fraud are rampant among managers.

HuffPost

Along with that rapid growth have come delays, weak oversight and increasing amounts of fraud that often have left millions of investors' dollars sitting in bank accounts as well as lives and businesses in limbo.

Los Angeles Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Lukyanov said he believed the amount of fraud on polling day would be small.

The Guardian

"There's always going to be a certain amount of fraud," he said.

The New York Times

In other words, the amount of fraud is about 0.09percentt of all of the money spent.

The Washington Post

Some criticism has been aimed at banks, which tolerate a certain amount of fraud as a cost of doing business.

The New York Times

The data indicate that in each of those cases the dollar amount of fraud is more than $1 million.

The New York Times

But with $17 billion in property taxes collected in 2011, Glenn Newman, president of the Tax Commission, said "even a small amount of fraud can result in real money lost".

The New York Times

Crowdfunding could have been a chance to experiment, to try different ways to see which method raised capital best for companies with a minimal amount of fraud.

The New York Times

"In three years, or maybe five years, they'll be back to fix these loopholes, because there will be a huge amount of fraud," Mr. Gillis forecast.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing "amounts of fraud", be specific about the context. Specify the type of fraud, the period, and the affected parties for clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "amounts of fraud" without providing context or supporting data. This can lead to misinterpretations. Always quantify or qualify the amounts to give a clearer picture.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "amounts of fraud" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the object of a verb or preposition. Ludwig AI indicates it is used to discuss the quantity or extent of fraudulent activities.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "amounts of fraud" is a grammatically correct noun phrase used to describe the quantity or extent of fraudulent activities. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's suitable for discussing the magnitude of fraud in various contexts. Although relatively rare, its usage appears primarily in news and media sources. To improve clarity, it's beneficial to specify the type, period, and affected parties involved. While "amounts of fraud" is not exceedingly common, alternative phrases like "levels of fraud" or "instances of fraud" can provide similar meanings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

levels of fraud

Replaces "amounts" with "levels", focusing on the degree or stage of fraud.

instances of fraud

Substitutes "amounts" with "instances", emphasizing individual occurrences of fraud.

extent of fraud

Replaces "amounts" with "extent", highlighting the scope or range of fraud.

volume of fraud

Uses "volume" instead of "amounts", focusing on the quantity or bulk of fraudulent activities.

scale of fraud

Replaces "amounts" with "scale", highlighting the magnitude or size of fraudulent activities.

degree of fraud

Uses "degree" to emphasize the intensity or severity of fraudulent actions.

quantity of fraud

Emphasizes the numerical amount of fraudulent events.

incidence of fraud

Highlights the frequency or rate at which fraud occurs.

frequency of fraudulent activities

Focuses on how often fraudulent activities happen.

proliferation of fraud

Emphasizes the rapid increase or spread of fraud.

FAQs

How can I use "amounts of fraud" in a sentence?

You can use "amounts of fraud" to describe the quantity or extent of fraudulent activities, for example: "The investigation revealed significant amounts of fraud within the company".

What can I say instead of "amounts of fraud"?

You can use alternatives like "levels of fraud", "instances of fraud", or "extent of fraud" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "amount of fraud" instead of "amounts of fraud"?

Both phrases can be correct depending on the context. "Amount of fraud" typically refers to a singular, collective measure, while "amounts of fraud" refers to multiple instances or varying quantities of fraud.

What's the difference between "amounts of fraud" and "fraudulent activities"?

"Amounts of fraud" refers to the quantity or extent of fraudulent actions, while "fraudulent activities" is a broader term encompassing all types of fraudulent behaviors. "Amounts of fraud" can be used to quantify the "fraudulent activities".