amounts fell through

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "amounts fell through" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be an attempt to convey that certain amounts were lost or did not materialize, but the expression is unclear. Example: "The budget was tight, and unfortunately, several amounts fell through, leaving us short on funds."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

But the deal fell through after some or all of the money had been handed over, with the kidnap gang claiming they had not received the due amount.

Independent

One trip fell through, then another.

The New York Times - Sports

They did not fall by that amount.

The New York Times

Lesser amounts fall upon the continental divide.

Wikipedia

After applying an unprecedented amount of effort into fulfilling a goal that I would define my identity permanently, it ended up falling through, leaving me at square one.

HuffPost

This amount falls in each subsequent year.

The Economist

In March 2008, a £400m bid from the Dubai International Capital was rejected, while talks with Kuwaiti billionaire Nasser al-Kharafi fell through 12 months later when he offered a similar amount.

Independent

That deal fell through.

The New York Times

That fell through.

The New York Times

One venue fell through.

The New York Times

The project fell through.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When referring to financial amounts or quantities that have not been realized or have been lost, use more direct and common phrases such as "amounts were lost" or "funding did not materialize".

Common error

Avoid combining words in unconventional ways, as in "amounts fell through", which may confuse readers. Opt for established expressions to ensure clear communication.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "amounts fell through" is an attempt to describe a failure or lack of realization regarding specific quantities. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase isn't correct in standard written English, suggesting it lacks established grammatical function.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "amounts fell through" is considered grammatically incorrect by Ludwig AI. It attempts to convey that certain expected funds or quantities were not realized. However, it's better to use clearer, more conventional phrases like "amounts were lost" or "funding did not materialize". The absence of examples in authoritative sources reinforces the recommendation to avoid this phrase in formal writing and opt for established alternatives to ensure clarity and professionalism.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

amounts were lost

Focuses on the disappearance or loss of specific sums of money or quantities.

amounts did not materialize

Emphasizes the failure of expected funds or quantities to appear or become available.

funding was not secured

Highlights the absence of guaranteed financial support.

financial backing failed

Indicates that monetary support or investment was unsuccessful.

resources were not obtained

Stresses the inability to acquire necessary resources, whether financial or material.

plans were unsuccessful

Refers to the failure of intended projects or schemes, often due to lack of funding.

efforts were fruitless

Emphasizes the lack of positive results despite dedicated effort.

endeavors collapsed

Highlights a sudden and complete failure of planned activities.

ventures disintegrated

Implies a gradual breakdown and failure of business or investment projects.

hopes were dashed

Focuses on the disappointment when desired outcomes do not occur.

FAQs

What does it mean when amounts didn't materialize?

It means that the expected or anticipated funds were not received or did not become available as planned. You can say instead that the "amounts were lost" or the "funding was not secured".

Is "amounts fell through" grammatically correct?

No, the phrase "amounts fell through" is not standard English. It's better to say something like "the "amounts were lost"" or "the "funding did not materialize"".

How can I rephrase "amounts fell through" in a business context?

In a business setting, you could use phrases such as "the "financial backing failed"" or "the "resources were not obtained"" to convey the same meaning more professionally.

What are some alternatives to "amounts fell through" that are more formal?

More formal alternatives include "funding was not secured", "the "project was unsuccessful"", or "efforts were fruitless".