amounts at stake

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "amounts at stake" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the potential consequences or risks involved in a situation, often in contexts like negotiations, competitions, or decision-making scenarios. Example: "In this negotiation, there are significant amounts at stake that could impact both parties' futures."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

15 human-written examples

For rich countries, the amounts at stake are minuscule.

The Economist

But the amounts at stake may soon change this.

The Economist

"It's clear that there are significant amounts at stake here," he said.

The New York Times

Note also that these were undergraduate students to whom the dollar amounts at stake were significant.

Harvard Business Review

Since this dispute appears to dwarf the others in terms of the amounts at stake, this is quite a touchy time for EU-U.S. trade relations.

Columbia University

Institutions with large amounts at stake could use the funds to take advantage of sharp market moves -- if the Federal Reserve unexpectedly changed interest rates, for example.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

45 human-written examples

There is a huge amount at stake.

The Economist

"There's an enormous amount at stake".

The New York Times

The amount at stake is enormous.

The Washington Post

So there is a huge amount at stake".

The New York Times

Both companies have a tremendous amount at stake with these legal cases.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing negotiations or legal proceedings, use "amounts at stake" to clearly indicate the financial implications and potential consequences for all parties involved.

Common error

Don't limit your understanding of "amounts at stake" to just money. It can also refer to non-monetary assets, reputation, or strategic advantages that are important in a particular situation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "amounts at stake" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject or object of a sentence or clause. It emphasizes the potential gains or losses associated with a particular situation or decision. Ludwig AI confirms its correct grammatical usage.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

20%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Science

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "amounts at stake" is a versatile noun phrase used to emphasize the significance of potential gains or losses. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct and frequently appears in News & Media, Formal & Business, and Academia. When writing, remember that "amounts at stake" can encompass both financial and non-financial implications. Be mindful of the context to ensure the phrase accurately reflects the situation's gravity. Consider alternatives such as "sums at stake" or "stakes involved" to add variety to your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

sums at stake

Replaces "amounts" with "sums", a synonym indicating a quantity of money.

money at risk

Focuses on the potential for financial loss using the term "at risk".

stakes involved

Uses "stakes" to emphasize what is risked or potentially gained.

potential losses

Highlights the possible financial detriments.

possible gains

Emphasizes the potential positive outcomes.

financial implications

Focuses on the financial consequences.

fiscal consequences

Highlights the economic repercussions.

interests in jeopardy

Refers to the imperiled interests or advantages.

financial exposure

Emphasizes the degree to which one is vulnerable to financial loss.

liabilities involved

Focuses on the potential legal or financial obligations.

FAQs

How can I use "amounts at stake" in a sentence?

You can use "amounts at stake" to emphasize the potential gains or losses in a decision or situation. For example, "The "amounts at stake" in this merger are considerable for both companies".

What are some alternatives to "amounts at stake"?

Alternatives include "sums at stake", "stakes involved", or "potential losses", depending on the specific context.

Is it appropriate to use "amounts at stake" in formal writing?

Yes, "amounts at stake" is suitable for formal writing, particularly in business, legal, or academic contexts where precision about financial implications is important.

What is the difference between "amounts at stake" and "money at risk"?

While similar, "amounts at stake" is broader and can include potential gains, while "money at risk" focuses specifically on the possibility of financial loss. Consider using "money at risk" when highlighting the dangers of investment or speculation.