The phrase "amount to then" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It seems to be an incomplete thought or a misphrasing, and it is unclear when it could be appropriately used without additional context.
Example: "The changes we made will amount to then a significant improvement in our process."
Alternatives: "result in" or "lead to".
If that were all it amounted to then it would be merely interesting, but because Nancarrow (1912-1977) had such an individual voice and ear - the greatest since Webern and Ives, according to Ligeti - the results were fabulously musical.
If this is all that Independence amounts to, then the lightweight forms of platonism are likely to satisfy the claim and thus qualify as genuinely platonist.
But if this is all that the a posteriori necessity of 'Hesperus = Phosphorus' amounts to, then all necessary statements are a posteriori in the relevant way.
But if this is what actuality for worlds amounts to, then assuming possible worlds are possibly actual, it would follow that for each possible world all its members could be true together.
If this is all that direct realism amounts to, then it is not a genuinely distinct epistemological alternative.[14] Is there any further way to make sense of the "directness" to which direct realist appeals, one that might yield more interesting epistemological results?
And if it did amount to stalking then a prosecution was possible under the Protection from Harassment Act.
But if you tell a child they'll never amount to anything then there's a high probability that it'll be a self-fulfilling prophecy.
If the ImClone investigation doesn't amount to anything, then knowledge of it would not be considered material.
In some cases, the prevention activity increases a person's length of life by an amount sufficient to then increase their risk of an adverse outcome (e.g., A1C control on strokes).
That seemed like an enormous amount to the then-17-year-old kid who grew up in a single-parent home in Woodside, Queens.
