amount on all

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "amount on all" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It is unclear when to use it due to its lack of grammatical structure and context. Example: "The total amount on all purchases was calculated incorrectly."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

Returns a new rectangle with its boundaries shifted outward by the given amount on all 4 sides.

Stanford University

In June 1987 and March 1988, the Government assessed Rabin close to $15,000 for these liabilities, and thereby placed a lien in the assessed amount on all his property, including his interest in the house.

Cornell University

Fidelity's annual broker and adviser sentiment index, released late last year, tried to put a dollar amount on all of this: technology-adept advisers who were focused on clients in their 30s and 40s managed, on average, $8 million more than colleagues focused on baby boomers.

The New York Times

It might be attributed to its highest acidity amount on all additives as described in this work (Table 2).

Applied Petrochemical Research

This rule results from the assumption that there is the same total protein amount on all gels.

Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

Protein spots for identification with mass-spectroscopy were subjectively selected based on visible changes of their amounts on all analytical silver gels (10 gels for every extract of both groups).

BMC Nephrology

Lyons said he had instructed BBC executives to publish the total amount spent on all on-screen talent in separate payment bands, ranging from under £250,000 to over £5m, along with the number of people in each band.

The Guardian

The most recent concession came in June, when Lyons said he had instructed BBC executives to publish the total amount spent on all on-screen talent in separate payment bands, ranging from under £250,000 to more than £5m, along with the number of people in each band.

The Guardian

This measure estimates the amount spent on all health services, supplies, health-related research, and construction activities in the United States during the calendar year.

BMC Health Services Research

The report forecasts that globally the amount spent on all forms of internet advertising will overtake the amount spent on TV advertising in 2018.

The Guardian

Pay only the minimum amount due on all of your debts except the smallest one.

WikiHow

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

For clarity, replace the phrase "amount on all" with more specific and grammatically correct alternatives such as "total amount for all", "amount spent on everything", or "funds allocated across all areas" depending on the intended meaning.

Common error

Avoid using "amount on all" when a more specific term is appropriate. For instance, instead of saying "the amount on all items", specify the context, such as "the total cost for all items" or "the funds spent across all projects".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "amount on all" functions as a prepositional phrase aiming to specify a quantity that applies to a range of items. However, as Ludwig AI indicates, its grammatical structure and context are often unclear, leading to potential misinterpretations.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Science

27%

Academia

14%

Less common in

Wiki

14%

Formal & Business

8%

Reference

7%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "amount on all" appears in various contexts, including news, science, and academia, it is not considered grammatically correct and can lead to ambiguity. Ludwig AI identifies its lack of clear meaning, suggesting the use of more precise alternatives such as "total amount for all" or "amount spent on everything" depending on the intended context. To enhance clarity, it is recommended to replace "amount on all" with more specific and grammatically sound options, ensuring effective communication in both formal and informal settings. Considering the grammatical issues and Ludwig's feedback, writers should prefer alternative phrases that convey similar meanings with greater precision.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

total amount for everything

Replaces "on all" with "for everything" to specify the scope of the total amount.

total sum of all items

Replaces "amount" with "sum" and "on all" with "of all items" for clarity.

amount distributed across everything

Emphasizes the distribution of the amount, replacing "on all" with "across everything".

the entire cost for everything

Replaces "amount" with "cost" to focus on expenses and "on all" with "for everything" for broader scope.

the charge applied across the board

Replaces "amount" with "charge" and rephrases "on all" as "across the board" to convey a uniform application.

total expenditure for all matters

Focuses on total spending, using "expenditure" instead of "amount" and specifying "for all matters".

the overall expense for everything included

Replaces "amount" with "expense" emphasizing cost, and clarifies the scope with "for everything included".

entire quantity available for everything

Shifts focus to available quantity, replacing "amount" with "quantity" and specifying scope with "available for everything".

funds allocated across everything

Focuses on allocated funds rather than a general amount, using "across everything" for distribution.

the full price for all elements

Specifies that the amount is a price, using "for all elements" to clarify the scope.

FAQs

What phrases can replace "amount on all" for better clarity?

Alternatives include "total amount for all", "sum of all", or phrases that specify the context, such as "amount spent on everything" or "funds allocated across all areas". For instance, instead of saying "the amount on all items", specify the context, such as "the total cost for all items" or "the funds spent across all projects".

Is "amount on all" grammatically correct?

While understandable, "amount on all" is not grammatically ideal. More precise phrasing improves clarity and correctness. Consider using alternatives like "total for all" or "sum of all".

How can I use "amount on all" in a sentence correctly?

It's better to rephrase. Instead of "the tax amount on all", try "the total tax for all transactions". Or, use "the amount spent on all items was considerable".

What's the difference between "amount on all" and "total for all"?

"Amount on all" is less precise. "Total for all" clearly indicates the combined sum, making it a better choice for clarity.