Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

amount of variances

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "amount of variances" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct term would typically be "number of variances" or "amount of variance," depending on the context. Example: "The amount of variances in the data set indicates a significant level of inconsistency."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

Factors accounting for trivial amount of variances (< 1.3%) have been excluded as they would contribute little to the overall interpretation of the factors.

For example, the covariance between CBCL7 and DSM is for 51% explained by A, 25% by D, and 24% by E. To obtain the unstandardized amount of variances explained, the standardized influences should be multiplied with the phenotypic covariance between the measures, which is.51 for CBCL7 and DSM.

*** p ≤ 0.001, **p ≤ 0.01, *p ≤ 0.05 ***p ≤ 0.001, ** p ≤ 0.01, * p ≤ 0.05 According to the results of the regression with all independent variables included in the model, physical health status variables and socio-demographic factors, the overall results yielded significant amount of variances explained for the functioning indexes, ranging from 32.6% to 63.9% (Table 7).

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

And even at secondary, homework "explains only a small amount of variance in pupils' achievement".

(2) The cumulative amount of variance criterion considers only the first components that cumulative amount of variance is greater than a given value (in most cases: 80%).

Isn't there a huge amount of variance in the acoustic properties of different people tapping, at different strengths, with different objects?

News & Media

TechCrunch

The terrain analysis variables did not explain a large amount of variance within the models.

A difference in the amount of variance was in the subtests effect.

Remaining components represent dimensions that account for a decreasing amount of variance.

It is clear that a large amount of variance is explained by the predictors.

However, there is a large amount of variance that remains unexplained.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "amount of variance" (singular) instead of "amount of variances" (plural) for grammatically correct phrasing. For multiple distinct sources of variation, consider "sources of variance".

Common error

Avoid using the plural form "variances" when referring to the general concept of variability. Use the singular form "variance" with "amount of" to maintain grammatical correctness.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

2.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "amount of variances" functions as a noun phrase, aiming to quantify the variability within a dataset or phenomenon. However, due to its grammatical incorrectness as indicated by Ludwig, it's not suitable for formal writing. The correct form is "amount of variance".

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "amount of variances" might appear in some scientific literature, it is grammatically incorrect. The correct phrase is "amount of variance". As pointed out by Ludwig, the examples found are limited, and using the correct grammar improves clarity and credibility. When discussing the different factors contributing to overall variability use the phrase "sources of variance" instead. Remember that accurate and precise language is crucial, especially in formal and academic writing.

FAQs

What is the correct way to refer to variability?

The grammatically correct way to refer to variability is to use "amount of variance". Avoid using the plural form, "amount of variances".

Is "amount of variance" interchangeable with "level of variability"?

While similar, "amount of variance" and "level of variability" have slightly different connotations. "Amount of variance" is more common in statistical contexts, while "level of variability" can be used more broadly.

What are some alternatives to "amount of variance"?

Alternatives include "degree of variation", "extent of dispersion", or "magnitude of difference", depending on the specific context.

When should I use "sources of variance" instead of "amount of variance"?

Use "sources of variance" when referring to different contributing factors to the overall variability, rather than the overall quantity of variability itself. For example, different experimental conditions can be considered "sources of variance".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

2.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: