The phrase "amount of traits" is not correct in standard written English.
The word "amount" is typically used with uncountable nouns, while "traits" is a countable noun.
Example: "The amount of traits that define a person's character can vary greatly."
Alternatives: "number of traits" or "variety of traits".
For each trait, these analyses resulted in a GIS layer with values representing 50 classes of similarity in the respective traits, each class representing an equal amount of trait variation.
Predictably, because each color polymorphic population differs in age and demographic history [ 14], the largest amount of trait variance in LPJ size, δN and BDI was due to differences in evolutionary history of the morph pairs ("evolutionary replicate"; Table 1).
However, although our molecular tree points to a polyphyletic goo-eating assemblage, weak support for the nodes separating Adelphicos from the other goo-eaters and the expressive amount of morphological traits shared by both groups suggest caution interpreting these results.
However, although our molecular tree points to a polyphyletic goo-eating assemblage, weak support values for the nodes separating Adelphicos from the other goo-eaters and the expressive amount of morphological traits shared by both groups indicate that these results are still tentative.
However, appropriate comparison of summed scores with correctly ordered categories seems to be possible as they seem to reflect the same amount of the trait (independence) under investigation.
In all scenarios, the matrix Geo explained a small but significant amount of the trait variance and this remained the case when current area of residence was included in the model.
aPeak position in cM based on the S4 genetic linkage map; bThe amount of total trait variance explained by a QTL at this locus, as %; cThe allelic effects are calculated as the effect of substitution of AA (IS8525) allele by BB (R931945-2-2) aLOele; D*Suggestive (LOD ≥ 2); **Significant (LOD ≥ 3); ***Highly significant (LOD ≥ 5).
Furthermore, House and Simmons [ 38] suggested that the amount of variation in traits under directional sexual selection may be limited by natural selection.
Participants in the stress and in the control group remembered about the same amount of implied (old) trait adjectives and not-implied (new) trait adjectives.
Although all traits exhibited non-random phylogenetic signal, the amount of signal varied among traits.
