The phrase "amount of standardization" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the degree or level of standardization in a particular context, such as processes, products, or systems.
Example: "The amount of standardization in the manufacturing process has significantly improved efficiency and quality control."
Alternatives: "degree of standardization" or "level of standardization".
Re "And Now, a Warning About Labels" (The Consumer, Oct. 25): No amount of standardization, regulation, clarity or consistency is going to help a patient who reads a label that says "Do not chew or crush" to mean chew and crush before swallowing.
Despite this, SR would require a fair amount of standardization, and standardization requires a consensus.
The U.S. Navy had done this by a process almost akin to the assembly line, sticking to one basic design per class with a maximum amount of standardization and rationalization.
Regular, if often incremental, innovation occurs in M&A, with examples including the development of the poison pill, no-shop/go-shop provisions, top-up options, forum selection bylaws, etc. M&A is particularly useful for studying innovation because it presents a puzzle: M&A agreements are highly complex and yet exhibit limited amounts of standardization.
Adjustment resulted in a small amount of bias, and standardization produced the most biased estimates in this scenario.
The lack of consistency between some of the physical and mechanical parameters explored from studies in the country may be due to an insufficient amount of information and/or non-standardization of criteria for testing materials.
Gastric emptying was evaluated as the percentage of dye remaining in the stomach relative to the total amount of dye recovered in a standardization group of mice that were sacrificed immediately after gavage.
Standardization of the amount of cells is for instance a problem when tissue samples are used.
This enabled standardization of the amount of tissue used in each case, thus removing the interference from water content.
Both the treatments share more CanPIs (3- and 4-IRD type) possibly due to the standardization of the amount of wounding between these two treatments.
This implies that the same amount of feces is always examined, enabling standardization and excellent observation of a sufficient sample amount that is easily prepared and may be examined after a short time (approximately 1 hour) or stored for several months.
