amount of future

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "amount of future" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It is not typically used in standard English, as "amount" is usually associated with quantifiable things, while "future" is an abstract concept. Example: "The amount of future we can predict is limited by current knowledge."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

33 human-written examples

We are committed to a certain amount of future climate change even if we curtail our emissions quickly.

The New York Times

But with the departure of blue-chip clients like Delta Air Lines and Merck, the amount of future cash available for such payments has declined.

The New York Times

Where travel agents selling package tours compete with the internet, the luxury, bespoke market has a certain amount of future proofing.

Independent

Households, in deciding how to divide their income between consumption and saving, will consider the amount of future consumption that can be gained by abstaining from consumption now (i.e., by saving).

Encyclopedia Britannica

The bank, which did not name the individuals implicated in the lawsuits, said it could not estimate the amount of future potential fines or when any announcement connected to the Libor investigations would be made.

The New York Times

Put another way, the amount of future spending cuts or tax increases necessary to stabilize government finances will always have to be larger when spending increases or tax cuts are deficit-financed.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

27 human-written examples

In a report to be released on Wednesday, the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations will recommend that regulators sharply limit the amount of futures trading by index investors.

The New York Times

The Dodd-Frank financial overhaul requires the commission to limit the amount of futures contracts that a single trader or firm can hold on a commodity, though the law failed to offer much guidance on the scope of the limits.

The New York Times

The Dodd-Frank Act, the financial regulatory overhaul enacted last year, requires the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to limit the amount of futures contracts that a single trader or firm can hold on certain commodities.

The New York Times

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission's so-called position limits rule, which stems from the Dodd-Frank financial regulatory overhaul, would cap the amount of futures contracts that a single trader or firm can hold on certain commodities.

The New York Times

The position limits would cap the amount of futures contracts that a single trader or firm can hold on 28 commodities like oil, wheat and corn, a response to wild price fluctuations that can hurt consumers at the gas pump and in the supermarket.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Relying on formal expressions of future time, such as "length of time", will usually enhance clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "amount" with non-countable or abstract nouns like "future". Instead, use words like "degree", "extent", or "scope" to convey the intended meaning more accurately.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "amount of future" functions primarily as a noun phrase, where "amount" acts as a quantifier specifying a quantity related to the abstract concept of the future. Ludwig AI indicates this phrase is widely used, although its correctness is questionable.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

44%

Science

41%

Wiki

6%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Formal & Business

3%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "amount of future" is used to express a quantity or measure related to prospective events. While prevalent in various sources, including news, science, and encyclopedias, Ludwig AI highlights that its grammatical correctness is questionable. It functions as a noun phrase and serves to quantify aspects of the future, but may be more precise with alternatives such as "extent of future" or "scope of future". When using "amount", ensure the noun is compatible and consider context to ensure clarity. While widely used, choosing more accurate phrasing is preferable, especially in formal writing, to prevent ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

quantity of future

Substitutes "amount" with "quantity", maintaining a focus on measurement.

extent of future

Replaces "amount" with "extent", focusing on the scope or range of the future.

scope of future

Focuses on the breadth or reach of future possibilities or events.

measure of future

Replaces "amount" with "measure", indicating an assessment or gauge of the future.

magnitude of future

Uses "magnitude" to emphasize the significance or size of future events.

volume of future

Employs "volume" to denote the magnitude of what is to come.

level of future

Focuses on the stage or position within the future timeline.

degree of futurity

Uses "degree" to quantify the futurity, highlighting the level or intensity of being in the future.

portion of future

Similar to "share", this highlights a segment of the future.

share of future

Emphasizes a portion or allocation of the future.

FAQs

How can I appropriately use the phrase "amount of future" in a sentence?

While "amount of future" appears in various contexts, it's often better to use more precise phrasing. For example, instead of "the amount of future climate change", consider "the extent of future climate change".

What's a good alternative to "amount of future" that sounds more grammatically correct?

Consider using phrases like "extent of future" or "scope of future" to express a similar idea with better grammatical accuracy. You could also use "degree of futurity".

Is it correct to use "amount of" with an abstract noun like "future"?

While understandable, using "amount of" with an abstract noun like "future" can be imprecise. It's often more appropriate to use words that better capture the abstract nature of the noun, such as "extent of", "degree of" or "scope of".

When might it be appropriate to use "amount of future" despite its grammatical ambiguity?

While not ideal, "amount of future" might be used in informal contexts or when the intended meaning is clear from the surrounding text. However, for formal writing, it is advisable to consider alternatives like "extent of future" or "scope of future".