amount of fund

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "amount of fund" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct expression would be "amount of funds" when referring to a quantity of money available for a specific purpose. Example: "The amount of funds allocated for the project has increased this year."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

"It is true that while the statute in question sets a maximum it does not set any minimum amount of fund reductions for state nonenforcement, nor have I identified any set by regulation," Mr. Roberts wrote in 1983.

The New York Times

The estimated total amount of fund (320 million US$) from urban informal sector workers thus corresponds to 11.8% of total current healthcare expenditure of Bangladesh.

Health Economics Review

In this section, we adopt the evaluations method by Tsujimura and Mizoshita (2003 .11 The previous study estimated the induced amount of fund demand and supply to analyze the effect of the central bank's monetary policies through the financial transactions between institutional sectors, which are represented in Leontief inverse.

Journal of Economic Structures

If this amount of fund can be collected, the situation of the workers can be vastly improved.

Huffington Post

The ideal study method would be to use NGS (Next Generation Sequencer) on CNV studies, but obtaining genomic resource from more than a thousand samples by NGS would require an astronomical amount of fund.

Plosone

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

The amount of funding that individual commissioners are allocated is calculated using "funding formulae" which apportion the funds.

The Guardian

"And we did an amazing amount of fund-raising".

The New York Times - Arts

And it takes a daunting amount of fund-raising (D.T.W.'s projected 2000 operating budget alone is $2.5 million).

The New York Times - Arts

Fernando Ferrer, the Bronx borough president, raised $904,000 in the period, with his total amount of fund-raising for the mayoral race now standing at $3.8 million.

The New York Times

Senior American officials here said that the amount of fund-raising in Germany for Mr. bin Laden and other radicals had never been a topic of conversation with the government here.

The New York Times

Republicans have lost no time highlighting that difference and offering back-of-the-envelope calculations to reporters of how much presidential time this amount of fund-raising is soaking up.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "amount of funding" or "amount of funds" instead of "amount of fund" for grammatically correct phrasing. For example, say "The amount of funding required is significant".

Common error

Avoid using a singular noun like "fund" after "amount of". Always use the plural form "funds" or the gerund form "funding" to maintain grammatical correctness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "amount of fund" functions as a noun phrase, intended to specify a quantity of money. However, as Ludwig AI points out, it is grammatically incorrect and should be replaced with "amount of funding" or "amount of funds".

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

40%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "amount of fund" appears in some sources, it is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI suggests that the correct alternatives are "amount of funding" or "amount of funds", depending on whether you are referring to the process of financing or the specific sum of money. The phrase is rare, appearing mainly in news and scientific contexts. It's best to avoid "amount of fund" in formal writing and opt for the grammatically correct alternatives for clarity and professionalism.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

sum of funds

Replaces "amount" with "sum", emphasizing the total quantity of funds.

level of funding

Focuses on the degree or extent of financial support.

quantity of funds

Substitutes "amount" with "quantity", highlighting the numerical aspect.

volume of funds

Replaces "amount" with "volume", suggesting a large quantity of funds.

financial resources

Uses a broader term to refer to available monetary means.

funding allocation

Highlights the distribution of financial resources to a specific purpose.

monetary support

Emphasizes the financial assistance provided.

budgetary provision

Refers to the funds set aside in a budget.

fiscal resources

Uses a more formal term for financial means.

capital resources

Focuses on the financial assets available for investment or development.

FAQs

Is it correct to say "amount of fund"?

No, the correct phrases are "amount of "funding"" or "amount of "funds"". The word "fund" should be pluralized or changed to its gerund form.

What's the difference between "amount of funding" and "amount of funds"?

"Amount of "funding"" refers to the act of providing financial resources, while "amount of "funds"" refers to the specific sum of money available. The choice depends on whether you're emphasizing the process or the quantity.

What are some alternatives to "amount of fund"?

Instead of "amount of fund", you can use phrases like "level of "funding"", "quantity of "funds"", or "financial "resources"".

How do I use "amount of funds" correctly in a sentence?

You can use "amount of funds" like this: "The amount of "funds" allocated for the project was insufficient" or "We need to increase the amount of "funds" available".