amount at risk

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "amount at risk" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in financial or insurance contexts to refer to the total value that could be lost in a particular investment or situation. Example: "Before making any investment decisions, it's crucial to assess the amount at risk to ensure you are comfortable with potential losses."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

8 human-written examples

But that was an adjusted figure based on the bank's overly optimistic estimate of the amount at risk.

The New York Times

The speed of the game, however, ends up raising the amount at risk because 60 to 100 hands can be played in an hour.

The New York Times - Tech

Though this does little to cut the amount at risk, it reduces operational costs and strips away a layer of complexity that has obscured trading exposures.

The Economist

The true amount at risk, after cancelling out offsetting exposures, is only about 3% of their notional value (that is $1.6 trillion, even so).

The Economist

Forget about those telephone-number figures: no principal amount is exchanged in a swap, so what matters is not the "notional" amount at risk but the cost of replacing the swaps a far lower number.

The Economist

In parimutuel and spread bets, the operator's profit comes from a commission on either the amount at risk or the winning amount (typically around 5% in online spread operators).

SERIEs

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

50 human-written examples

Analysts differ on the amounts at risk.

The New York Times

(The amounts at risk because of defaults, though, are generally small compared with the capital of the banks in question).

The New York Times

These include: understand correlations; calculate your exposures based upon total amounts at risk; don't trust sophisticated models, keep it simple; and use a multi-metric exposure management approach that does not rely on one measure.

The Economist

Model offsets consisted of the natural logarithm of the amount of at-risk follow-up time within each community and surveillance period.

Environmental Health Perspectives

Alcohol causes seven forms of cancer, and people consuming even low to moderate amounts are at risk, according to new analysis.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing investments or financial liabilities, use "amount at risk" to clearly quantify the potential financial loss. This provides transparency and helps stakeholders understand the scope of possible negative impacts.

Common error

While both phrases relate to potential loss, "amount at risk" is usually more specific about quantifiable financial exposure, whereas "amount at stake" can refer to broader consequences beyond mere monetary value. Ensure your choice accurately reflects the context.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "amount at risk" functions as a noun phrase, often acting as the subject or object of a sentence. It quantifies the potential for loss, as confirmed by Ludwig, and is frequently used in contexts requiring a precise assessment of financial exposure.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

30%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "amount at risk" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed term used to denote the potential financial exposure in various scenarios. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is most commonly found in News & Media, Science and Formal & Business contexts, with authoritative sources such as The New York Times and The Economist frequently employing it. When using this phrase, ensure that the quantification of risk is as precise as possible to avoid ambiguity. The phrase should not be confused with "amount at stake", which carries broader implications. When needed, semantically similar alternatives include "financial exposure" and "capital at stake".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

risk exposure level

Specifies the degree of susceptibility to adverse effects.

financial exposure

Specifically denotes the potential for monetary loss.

capital at stake

Refers to the financial resources that could be lost or gained.

monetary commitment at stake

Highlights the financial investment that is subject to potential loss.

potential loss

Focuses on the possible financial detriment without specifying the quantity.

assets endangered

Highlights the threat to valuable possessions.

investment jeopardized

Focuses on the risk to invested funds.

possible exposure

Highlights the vulnerability to negative outcomes, but does not quantify the risk.

level of vulnerability

Emphasizes the degree to which something is susceptible to harm.

degree of hazard

Refers to the level of danger involved.

FAQs

How is "amount at risk" used in financial contexts?

In finance, "amount at risk" specifies the total capital potentially subject to loss from an investment, loan, or other financial activity. It's crucial for risk assessment and determining appropriate capital reserves.

What's a good substitute for "amount at risk"?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives like "potential loss", "financial exposure", or "capital at stake". The best choice hinges on the specific nuance you aim to convey.

Is it more accurate to say "amount at risk" or "potential loss"?

"Amount at risk" is more precise when referring to a specific, quantifiable financial figure subject to loss. "Potential loss" is more general, encompassing broader, less defined risks.

How does calculating the "amount at risk" help businesses?

Determining the "amount at risk" allows businesses to implement strategies for mitigating potential losses, allocate resources effectively, and make informed decisions about risk tolerance and investment.