The phrase "amount and variance" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts involving statistics, finance, or data analysis when discussing quantities and their variability.
Example: "The report highlighted the amount and variance of sales over the last quarter, providing insights into market trends."
Alternatives: "quantity and variability" or "total and deviation".
The amount of transgression and variance explained by each PC axis for both F1 and F2 hybrids is shown in detail in Additional file 2. In all F1 and F2 hybrid cross types, there were significant differences between families in the distribution of phenotypes in morphospace.
Descriptive statistics (variance, mean, histograms) were generated for each item and examined for amount of variance and middle range mean scores as well as sufficient endorsement frequency.
A locus at or near ERECTA (chromosome 2) and a locus located on chromosome 5 (SNP304) controlled mainly SFW (LOD scores 5·0 and 4·1) and the amount of variance explained was 14·3 and 10·6 %, respectively (Supplementary Data Fig. S6).
These objectives are easily configurable, with the possibility of specifying user preferences on some characteristics of the results, specifically the number of genes, number of conditions, overlapping amount and gene mean variances.
The only significant predictor of Novelty score was Frontal theta score (β = 0.543, t21 = 2.967, p = 0.007), whereas Visual exploration, Manual exploration and Number of samples did not explain a significant amount of variance and were therefore dropped from the model (multiple regression using Enter method produced the same results; see the electronic supplementary material for details).
The criteria for determining the number of factors were multi-faceted, and took into account the Kaiser criterion, scree plots and amount of variance explained by potential models, but with an emphasis on interpretability.
The experimental reaction rates, the R2 value (reflects the amount of variance), and the root mean square deviation (RMSD) were used for the evaluation of the fitting.
An additional test of structural invariance concerns the degree to which the underlying factors have the same amount of variance and covary to the same extent across groups.
The Goodness-of-Fit Index (GFI) measures the relative amount of variance and covariance predicted by the model, with a value greater than 0.95 indicating good fit [ 71].
This separation of effects among the strains could mean a relatively small number of variants explaining a relatively large amount of variance and motivates future mapping studies.
