The phrase "among different attributes" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing various characteristics or features within a particular context, such as in data analysis or comparative studies.
Example: "The study aimed to identify the most significant factors among different attributes that influence consumer behavior."
Alternatives: "among various characteristics" or "within diverse features".
This paper reports a study of the subjective preference to daylit indoor environment of a residential room using conjoint analysis, which is a highly reputable method used to analyze the mutual relationships among different attributes.
All these clusters are further analyzed using association rule mining to find the correlation among different attributes in the data.
Likewise, the linked relationship among different attributes (for example, age, gender, and health records) raises the intra-dimensional complexity issue.
With ratio weights (proposed by von Winterfeldt and Edwards [29]) and semantic scales, such as the AHP scale (proposed by Saaty [22]) and the MACBETH scale (proposed by Bana e Costa and Vasnick [1]), the weight eliciting questions are derived from an interpretation of weights as swings and the respondent is asked to compare swings among different attributes.
Sjoerd and Kwakernaak [9] explored the application of fuzzy set theory to solve multiple-attribute decision problems under uncertainty and proposed the concept of membership level to fuzzify the inherent uncertainty of preference (ratings or weights) and to quantify the uncertainty of ratings or weights among different attributes or stakeholders.
An association rule describes a relationship among different attributes.
Principal component analysis was carried out on the agronomic, biochemical and sensory traits to describe relations among the different attributes as well as detect important components.
Variation in each type of delay was observed among women with different attributes and in context of health care service delivery.
Because switching wells is a dichotomized outcome and the analysis involved follow-up time, we used Cox proportional hazard models to compare the likelihood of switching wells among groups with different attributes.
BACKGROUND: In treating migraine sufferers, physicians can choose from among seven triptans with different attributes.
Another problem with the clustering approach is that it assumes that the population of interest can be divided into distinct genetic groups, and therefore it is less suited to the situations where a subtle structure exists, or when there is association among individuals according to different attributes than the specified ancestries.
