Exact(18)
Chemical and electrochemical reduction of Mo2O4 cys)2-2 has been studied in ammonia buffer.
The electrodes were electrochemically sensitive to copper in ammonia buffer solution with a detection limit of 0.074 mgl−1.
Compared with acetic acid, the most frequently used supporting electrolyte, ammonia buffer solution leads to a four times higher signal.
The indicator for Ca+2 was NaOH and ammonium purpurate, and the indicators for Mg+2 were ammonia buffer solution and eriochrome.
The ruminal disappearance of propionate increased 30±12%2% for the butyric compared with ammonia buffer and 12.5 ± 8% when compared with control.
It was further established that the SPCE/BiFE sensor delivers more sensitive results in ammonia buffer (pH = 9.2) solution, compared to acetate buffer (pH = 4.8) solution.
Similar(42)
Magnetic TiO2/Ti-IMAC hyper-porous microspheres were added to one plate (position 2), Lys-C/trypsin digested samples were added in a separate plate (position 4), phosphopeptide enrichment wash buffers were dispensed into several plates (positions 3, 5, 6, and 7), and ammonia elution buffer to the final plate (position 8).
The disulfide formation was achieved with 20 % DMSO in ammonia acetate buffer (pH 6.2) for 2 days.
For [11C]DASB, the following conditions were applied: wavelength 254 nm; Flow rate 1.0 mL/min; Mobile phase: A: 50 mM ammonia phosphate buffer, pH 9.3; B: 90 % ACN / 10%% aqua dest.
(v/v); Isocratic: 40 % A / 60%% B. For -[11C]PHNO, the following conditions were applied: wavelength 280 nm; Flow rate 1.6 mL/min (0-30"), then 1.0 mL/min; Mobile phase: A: 100 mM ammonia phosphate buffer, pH 2.1 including 5 mM sodium-1-octasulfonate; B: 90 % ACN / 10%% aqua dest.
(v/v); C: Aqua purificata (HPLC grade); D: 50 mM ammonia phosphate buffer, pH 9.3; Isocratic: 33 % A / 20 % B / 14 % C / 33 % D. Results: For [11C]DASB, total HPLC run time was 1.0 min; precursor MASB eluted after 23 sec, DASB eluted after 55 sec, respectively.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com