Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "amendments required for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing changes or modifications that are necessary for a particular document, project, or situation.
Example: "The amendments required for the contract must be submitted by the end of the week."
Alternatives: "changes needed for" or "revisions necessary for".
Exact(1)
In addition, easily accessible information is needed on ranges of metal tolerance in metallophyte species suitable for growth in mine tailings; minimum amounts of organic amendments required for successful plant establishment; and minimum water requirements necessary for successful plant establishment.
Similar(59)
(Later amendments required a supermajority for allowing insurrectionist legislators to serve in government again, and deciding whether the President remains unfit to execute his office after a period of disability).
As a consequence of the different wet bulk densities, the same treatment for different amendments required different masses per unit surface area (Table 1).
Additionally, the state's amendments required that the legislature provide for a free public school system.
It is so restrictive that amendments are required for local laws on mosquito control and litter enforcement.
And there will also be a renewed Senate stoush when the government re-presents the land transport infrastructure amendment bill, which it withdrew in May after it realised Labor had the Senate numbers for amendments requiring the government to release cost benefit analyses for major projects and consult the independent advisory body, Infrastructure Australia.
However, the same Department also opined that legislative amendments would be required for placing the proposed process on a sound legal footing.
A zoning amendment would be required for putting up office buildings without an industrial component.
He speaks of 'the zeal and insouciance with which the mass media assails public officials".' The Sullivan case held that the First Amendment required public officials suing for libel to prove that the statements they complained of were made with "actual malice" -- that is, with knowledge that the statements were false or with reckless disregard as to whether they were false.
In addition, there is undoubtedly a serious argument that the consent of the Scottish parliament may be required for amendments to be made to the Human Rights Act (depending on what they were).
The more grave and important the questions discussed, the nearer should the opinion that is to prevail approach unanimity.Rousseau's principle can be seen in the support required for amendments to the American constitution: two-thirds of each house of Congress and three-quarters of the states must give the go-ahead.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com