The phrase "amendment which is a" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to a specific amendment and providing additional information about it.
Example: "The proposed amendment which is a significant change to the existing law has sparked much debate among lawmakers."
Alternatives: "amendment that is a" or "amendment which serves as a".
"If you vote for the amendment, which is a wrecking amendment, then we are all responsible for secret courts in civil cases and we won't have anyone else to blame: not Labour, not the Conservatives.
If the constitution does not require birthright citizenship, then Congress may be able to change the law without passing a constitutional amendment, which is a significant hurdle.
In America, it's important to walk the line between the Second Amendment, which is a federally protected right, and making sure they don't get in the hands of dangerous people.
There's another amendment on a public option that probably has a lot more possibility, and that is the so-called Snowe amendment, which is a trigger for a public option over the course of several years.
The path back toward real Internet freedom lies in restoring the presumption of liberty enshrined in the First Amendment, which is not a sword with which the government can ensure fairness, diversity or openness, but a shield against government meddling in media, communications and online markets.
You don't "pay for" tax cuts, Mike Lee Anywayy, he wants a "balanced budget amendment," which is like wanting a pony that poops gold doubloons.
According to Rep. Chris Smith (R-N.J ., who intR-N.J . H.R. 3, the bill is intended to make permanent this requirement of the Hyde Amendment, whoch introducedly renewed on a year-to-year basis.
[I]nterruptions of the reading of an amendment that has been proposed are not in order, even for the purpose of proposing a substitute amendment to a committee amendment which is being read.
Mr. Feingold's amendment, which is co-sponsored by Senator John McCain, a Republican of Arizona, and Senator Mark Begich, a Democrat of Alaska, should be passed by Congress and sent to the states.
Only a constitutional amendment, which is exceedingly unlikely, could undo that core holding.
That requires a constitutional amendment, which is why no attorney general of either party has tried to enforce the 1968 law in the intervening decades.
