The phrase "amendment the system" is not correct in English and does not convey a clear meaning.
It seems to be an incomplete thought, and without additional context, it is difficult to determine its intended use.
Example: "We need to discuss how to amend the system to improve efficiency."
Alternatives: "revise the system" or "modify the system".
But absent a constitutional amendment, the system will not be used for general elections of state offices, because of the provision in the Maine Constitution that state races need to be decided by a plurality.
At the same time, despite all this intrusion into our lives and the obvious violations of the Fourth Amendment, the system completely missed the Boston bombers, two of the dumbest, least sophisticated bro terrorists on the planet.
How many Americans have died in the past twelve years due to terrorism in the U.S.? At the same time, despite all this intrusion into our lives and violations of the Fourth Amendment, the system completely missed the Boston bombers, two of the dumbest, least sophisticated bro' terrorists in the world.
As a result of our amendments, the system will be simpler, more flexible, more efficient and less bureaucratic.
In 1998 a constitutional amendment changed the system of elections to open lists (allowing voters to choose their preferred candidates as well as preferred party) to promote equal representation.
Look, I think to some degree, sub-national action that is predicated on that state or municipality system of law seems utterly compatible with the 10th amendment, the federal system of government here in the U.S.
Prior to the recent amendment, the German system permitted general review of foreign takeovers on the grounds of public order and security, as well as a sector-specific review procedure for particularly sensitive industries.
It likely that it is this prospect, as well as pressure from his political right, that has France's Nicolas Sarkozy calling for amendments to the system of free movement.
For this reason, a separate category as established in the SM is indeed a valid amendment to the systems.
Before 1991, when amendments mandated the systems in all new buildings, New Jersey's Uniform Fire Safety Act had, since 1984, required sprinklers only in new buildings 12 stories high or more.
The rationale for choosing these depths was that the 1.82 m depth is close but below the amendment injection system, whereas the 3.66 m depth is a sand lens that represents the leading edge of the hydrocarbon plume.
