The phrase "amendment that may" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing potential changes or modifications to a document, law, or agreement.
Example: "The proposed amendment that may affect the current regulations is under review by the committee."
Alternatives: "modification that could" or "change that might".
Howard F. Jaeckel New York, May 11 , 2010To the Editor: Re "A Potential Court Pick's Dilemma at Harvard" (news article, May 7): I'd like to add a detail about Solicitor General Elena Kagan's struggle with the Solomon Amendment that may bear on her willingness to place the law above ideology.
And in Missouri, voters rejected an amendment that may have curtailed future voting access.
There is no limit to the number of amendments that may be proposed, and new amendments may be offered as rapidly as the pending amendment is disposed of.
So here we have Clinton breathing new life into the cold-war treaty provided Putin will allow some minor amendments that may not meet future U.S. defense needs.
Morsi, who has never had any experience in a democratic system, has responded by issuing a series of clumsy constitutional amendments that may have been aimed at improving efficiency, but only frighten people and inspire resistance.
And British officials hint that even if Mr Brown stayed away, other ministers would almost certainly attend.Better still for Mr Mugabe, both factions of Zimbabwe's divided opposition, the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC), have recently sided with the ruling party, ZANU-PF, endorsing some controversial constitutional amendments that may well strengthen its grip.
At the same time, organic matter inputs in compost or vermicompost, produced in the presence of earthworms, are valuable soil amendments that may increase plant growth.
Little information is presently available on the chemical nature of analogous chemical species in manure and humic amendments that may be responsible for their P mobilizing qualities.
Any amendments that may be required once the trial has started will be submitted for approval by the ethics committee.
Some 1,201,607 people backed a change of the 1937 constitution to enshrine in the section titled The Family an amendment that "marriage may be contracted in accordance with law by two persons without distinction as to their sex".
The Constitution contemplates, by virtue of the First Amendment, that we may freely raise concerns about elected officials, and also that in the extreme circumstance envisioned in the Twenty-fifth Amendment, medical professionals would be free to help us understand whether the President can fulfill his duties.
